Literature DB >> 6741781

Sampling for formaldehyde in workplace and ambient air environments--additional laboratory validation and field verification of a passive air monitoring device compared with conventional sampling methods.

E V Kring, G R Ansul, A N Basilio, P D McGibney, J S Stephens, H L O'Dell.   

Abstract

Results of three extensive plant field tests using both area and personal sampling and involving 51 sets of comparison samples show the Du Pont Pro-Tek Formaldehyde Badge to have excellent correlation with three commonly used formaldehyde monitoring methods. In addition, comprehensive laboratory validation tests are reported which confirm an overall accuracy of +/- 9.6 to +/- 11.6% for the badge over an exposure range of 0.12-6.8 ppm. Laboratory test data are also included showing that the badge: (1) meets NIOSH and OSHA accuracy requirements of less than or equal to +/- 25% down to 1.6 ppm-hours (200 ppb) for an 8-hour TWA exposure; (2) is capable of accurately sampling for 15-minute exposures; and (3) is not affected by pressure or relative humidity variations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6741781     DOI: 10.1080/15298668491399857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J        ISSN: 0002-8894


  1 in total

1.  Comparison between active (pumped) and passive (diffusive) sampling methods for formaldehyde in pathology and histology laboratories.

Authors:  Eun Gyung Lee; Rana Magrm; Mohannad Kusti; Michael L Kashon; Steven Guffey; Michelle M Costas; Carie J Boykin; Martin Harper
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.155

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.