Literature DB >> 6740966

Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash.

J M Wolfe.   

Abstract

An observer views a long (1-2 sec) monocular stimulus. Following stimulus offset there is a dark interstimulus interval (ISI). After the ISI, brief test flashes are presented to both eyes simultaneously. For ISIs less than 100-200 msec, only the test flash contralateral to the stimulated eye is seen. The test flash in the ipsilateral eye is not seen. For ISIs of 200-1000 msec, the contralateral test flash is seen more clearly and completely than the ipsilateral flash (Experiments 1 and 2). The initial and ipsilateral test flash need not be spatially similar. The initial stimulus can be dim but must be longer than 150 msec (Experiment 3). Experiment 3 precludes forward masking or light adaptation as explanation. The effect is relatively independent of the length of the test flash (Experiment 4). The results can be explained in terms of the known properties of binocular rivalry and reinforce the hypothesis (Fox and Check, 1968) that rivalry acts nonselectively, independent of factors such as spatial frequency, luminance, or orientation.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6740966     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90044-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  71 in total

1.  Oscillatory neuronal synchronization in primary visual cortex as a correlate of stimulus selection.

Authors:  Pascal Fries; Jan-Hinrich Schröder; Pieter R Roelfsema; Wolf Singer; Andreas K Engel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Deconstructing continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Eunice Yang; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND NEURAL DYNAMICS.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Sang-Hun Lee; David Heeger
Journal:  Psichologija (Vilniaus Univ)       Date:  2008-06-01

Review 4.  United we sense, divided we fail: context-driven perception of ambiguous visual stimuli.

Authors:  P C Klink; R J A van Wezel; R van Ee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  R Blake; D Westendorf; R Fox
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-12

6.  Consciousness of the first order in blindsight.

Authors:  Arash Sahraie; Paul B Hibbard; Ceri T Trevethan; Kay L Ritchie; Lawrence Weiskrantz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Similar effects of feature-based attention on motion perception and pursuit eye movements at different levels of awareness.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Tracking without perceiving: a dissociation between eye movements and motion perception.

Authors:  Miriam Spering; Marc Pomplun; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-12-28

9.  Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Sang-Hun Lee; Randolph Blake; David J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-05       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Context-dependent perceptual modulation of single neurons in primate visual cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Maier; Nikos K Logothetis; David A Leopold
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-16       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.