Literature DB >> 673987

Anticholinergic drugs, buccal ulceration and mucosal potential difference.

G J Huston, S M Abrams, P Turner.   

Abstract

Measurement of changes in buccal mucosal potential difference produced by contact with drug formulations may provide a means of predicting their mucosal toxicity and ulcerogenic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  1978        PMID： 673987      PMCID： PMC2425147          DOI： 10.1136/pgmj.54.631.331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN： 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  7 in total

1.  Oesophageal ulceration due to clindamycin.

Authors:  D R Sutton; J K Gosnold
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-06-18

2.  Measurement of buccal potential difference in the assessment of mucosal damaging agents [proceedings].

Authors:  G J Huston; P Turner
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Ulceration of mouth due to emepronium bromide.

Authors:  T M Strouthidis; G D Mankikar; R E Irvine
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1972-01-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Transmucosal electrical potentials of human rectum and pelvic colon.

Authors:  C J Edmonds; R C Godfrey
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1969-12       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Ulceration due to emepronium bromide tablets.

Authors:  A Pilbrant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-04-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Oesophageal ulceration due to emepronium bromide.

Authors:  S Kenwright; A D Norris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-03-05       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Electrical potential difference and sodium and potassium fluxes across rectal mucosa in ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  C J Edmonds; D Pilcher
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1973-10       Impact factor: 23.059
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.