Literature DB >> 6738072

Evaluation of the results of three different methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatment.

R Zanolla, C Monzeglio, A Balzarini, G Martino.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the following methods of postmastectomy lymphedema treatment: pneumatic massage with uniform pressure, pneumatic massage with differentiated pressure, and manual lymphatic massage. The study concerned three groups of 20 mastectomized patients with secondary early developed arm lymphedema. The measurement of circumference on seven points of both arms, the self-scoring mood questionnaire, and the visual analogue scale (VAS) were evaluated before, at the end, and 3 months after the treatment. We observed a permanent edema reduction, which was statistically significant, with uniform pressure pneumatic massage and with manual lymphatic massage, but not with differentiated pneumatic massage. The VAS and the self-scoring mood questionnaire made from measuring the subjective ratings of the patients confirmed the objective evaluations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6738072     DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930260317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  8 in total

Review 1.  Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Jeanette Ezzo; Eric Manheimer; Margaret L McNeely; Doris M Howell; Robert Weiss; Karin I Johansson; Ting Bao; Linda Bily; Catherine M Tuppo; Anne F Williams; Didem Karadibak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-21

2.  Bioelectrical impedance self-measurement protocol development and daily variation between healthy volunteers and breast cancer survivors with lymphedema.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Candace M Bonner; Jennifer K Doersam; Bethany A Rhoten; Benjamin Schultze; Mary S Dietrich
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.589

3.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 11. Lymphedema.

Authors:  S R Harris; M R Hugi; I A Olivotto; M Levine
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Pressures and timing of intermittent pneumatic compression devices for efficient tissue fluid and lymph flow in limbs with lymphedema.

Authors:  Marzanna Zaleska; Waldemar L Olszewski; Pradeep Jain; Sashi Gogia; Arun Rekha; Samsita Mishra; Marek Durlik
Journal:  Lymphat Res Biol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.589

5.  Breast cancer survivors' perspectives of critical lymphedema self-care support needs.

Authors:  Sheila H Ridner; Bethany A Rhoten; M Elise Radina; Melissa Adair; Sydney Bush-Foster; Vaughn Sinclair
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women's Health Study.

Authors:  Rehana L Ahmed; Anna Prizment; DeAnn Lazovich; Kathryn H Schmitz; Aaron R Folsom
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  A randomized controlled trial comparing two types of pneumatic compression for breast cancer-related lymphedema treatment in the home.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Suzanne Davey; Erik A Maus; Renie Guilliod; Harvey N Mayrovitz
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Development of a framework for pneumatic device selection for lymphedema treatment.

Authors:  Sonja M Maul; Julie A Devine; Carolyn R Wincer
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2009-12-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.