Literature DB >> 6737364

The accuracy of age-sex registers in general practice.

M G Sheldon, A L Rector, P A Barnes.   

Abstract

A ;point-prevalent evaluation' of the accuracy of the age-sex register (ASR) was undertaken in 10 general practices. The average ASR inflation rate was 4 per cent when compared with the Family Practitioner Committee (FPC) register (range 2.2-8.3 per cent) and 7.2 per cent when compared with the patients themselves (range 2.6-19.4 per cent). List deflation was no more than 2 per cent overall. There was a wide interpractice variation in the accuracy of the ASR, and two of the factors that may be associated with this are the situation in an inner city renewal area and a large proportion of patients in the 20-40 years age group. When the patients were asked to verify the information contained on the ASR it was found that the address was incorrect for 10 per cent of patients (range 5.0-20.0 per cent) and the date of birth was incorrect for 5 per cent.Before using it for research purposes, the ASR should be checked against the FPC register, and in view of our findings it should also be checked with a sample of the patients themselves to ensure a sufficiently accurate population denominator.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6737364      PMCID: PMC1959693     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract        ISSN: 0035-8797


  3 in total

1.  Missing patients on a health centre file.

Authors:  D R Hannay; E J Maddox
Journal:  Community Health (Bristol)       Date:  1977-05

2.  The reliability and validity of the age-sex register as a population denominator in general practice.

Authors:  R C Fraser
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1978-05

3.  The accuracy of age-sex registers, practice medical records and family practitioner committee registers.

Authors:  R C Fraser; D G Clayton
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1981-07
  3 in total
  15 in total

1.  Estimating the point accuracy of population registers using capture-recapture methods in Scotland.

Authors:  M J Garton; M I Abdalla; D M Reid; I T Russell
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Create and maintain an age-sex register.

Authors:  F M Sullivan; R C Eagers; K Lynch
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-07-11

3.  Immunization, practice records and the white paper.

Authors:  E Pennington; R M Wilcox
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1988-11

4.  Contraceptive care and family planning in an urban general practice.

Authors:  J S McCracken
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1986-01

5.  Evaluation of the use of general practice age-sex registers in epidemiological research.

Authors:  K Walsh
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Age-sex registers as a screening tool for general practice: size of the wrong address problem.

Authors:  R C Fraser
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-10-06

7.  Cervical cytology screening and government policy.

Authors:  S K Ross
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

8.  Attendance and non-attendance for breast screening at the south east London breast screening service.

Authors:  J McEwen; E King; G Bickler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-07-08

9.  A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project 1981-86. 1. Methodology, demography and incident cases of first-ever stroke.

Authors:  J Bamford; P Sandercock; M Dennis; C Warlow; L Jones; K McPherson; M Vessey; G Fowler; A Molyneux; T Hughes
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 10.154

10.  Survey response rates: national and regional differences in a European multicentre study of vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; D Marsden; C Matthis; H Raspe; A J Silman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.