Literature DB >> 6736420

The influence of temporal cues on the strength of periodicity pitches.

C Lundeen, A M Small.   

Abstract

Three different waveforms were generated from the same component frequencies by setting the phase of the components so they were either homophasic (all component sinusoids start at 0 degree), diphasic (sinusoids alternate between -45 degrees and + 45 degrees), or heterophasic (starting phase randomly selected). Listeners were asked to rate the saliency of all periodicity pitches they could detect in stimuli which contained 12 or more components at frequencies above the region where pitches were perceived . A major finding was that the highest ratings of fundamental frequency (f1) pitch "strength" were always obtained for homophasic waveforms, which among the test stimuli have the most abrupt envelope fluctuations. In contrast, diphasic and heterophasic waveforms, which have smoother envelopes, yielded lower pitch strength estimates at f1 and higher ratings two octaves above the fundamental. These data indicate that information concerning the stimulus waveform envelope influences the relative prominence of competing pitches evoked by periodicity pitch stimuli. However, no one-to-one correspondence between pitch and waveform periodicity is apparent.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6736420     DOI: 10.1121/1.390867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  4 in total

1.  Discrimination of phase spectra in complex sounds by the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana).

Authors:  C A Hainfeld; S L Boatright-Horowitz; S S Boatright-Horowitz; A Megela Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues.

Authors:  A M Simmons; R C Buxbaum; M P Mirin
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve.

Authors:  Leonardo Cedolin; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  A Neuronal Network Model for Pitch Selectivity and Representation.

Authors:  Chengcheng Huang; John Rinzel
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.