Literature DB >> 67348

Day-case surgery for hernias and haemorrhoids. A clinical, social, and economic evaluation.

I T Russell, H B Devlin, M Fell, N J Glass, D J Newell.   

Abstract

Patients with inguinal hernia or haemorrhoids were randomly allocated to an experimental group expected to stay in hospital for only eight hours after surgery or a control group scheduled for discharge on the fifth or sixth day. There was no difference in clinical outcome between the two groups of hernia patients. However, complications were twice as common in haemorrhoid day-patients as in long-stay haemorhoid patients. The standard postoperative regimen for haemorrhoids has since been changed and the change has been accompanied by a fall in the complication-rate. Day-case surgery appears to have similar social effects on the patient and his family as traditional hospital care. There was no significant difference in either the additional expenditure incurred or patients' perceptions of the disruption associated with their operation and convalescence. In the hospital under study, day-case surgery was saving between 20 pounds and 29 pounds per patient. However, this conclusion should not be extrapolated to the N.H.S. as a whole without taking into account the use to which the resources released by day-case surgery will be put.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1977        PMID: 67348     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(77)92790-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  32 in total

1.  Measurement of costs and benefits in health and health services.

Authors:  K G Wright
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 2.  Economic aspects of general anaesthesia.

Authors:  S P Rhodes; S Ridley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The (near) equivalence of cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses. Fact or fallacy?

Authors:  C Donaldson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Day case surgery and workload.

Authors:  J Boyce; D Ralphs; B Devlin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-02

5.  Day case surgery generates no increased workload for community based staff. True or false?

Authors:  N C Stott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-28

6.  More day surgery.

Authors:  V Ruckley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-24

Review 7.  The generalisability of pharmacoeconomic studies.

Authors:  J Mason
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Why are we trying to reduce length of stay? Evaluation of the costs and benefits of reducing time in hospital must start from the objectives that govern change.

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-09

Review 9.  Variations in lengths of stay and rates of day case surgery: implications for the efficiency of surgical management.

Authors:  M Morgan; R Beech
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 3.710

10.  Day-case or short-stay admission for arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  A E Weale; C E Ackroyd; G V Mani; I G Winson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.