Literature DB >> 6728585

Age at death used to assess the effect of interhospital transfer of newborns.

N Paneth, J L Kiely, M Susser.   

Abstract

In New York City, newborn units classified as level 1 (no intensive care) frequently transfer low-birth-weight infants to units classified as level 3 (complete intensive care), but level 2 units (those with intermediate levels of care) transfer rarely. As deaths occurring in the first hours of life are unlikely to be affected by infant transport services, early (first four hours), late (four hours to 28 days), and overall neonatal death rates were separately examined at each of the three levels of care for singleton live-births weighing 501 to 2,250 g. As previously reported, overall neonatal mortality (adjusted for birth weight, gestational age, sex, and race) for births at level 1 units (163.0/1,000) and level 2 units (168.1/1,000) was similar, and rates for births at level 3 (128.0/1,000) were significantly lower. Mortality up to four hours, and from four hours to 28 days, however, differed between level 1 and level 2 units. Among early deaths, the mortality for level 1 births was 68.0/1,000, significantly higher than both the rate for level 2 births (46.0/1,000) and for level 3 births (40.6/1,000). Between four hours and 28 days, mortality relative to level 3 improved for level 1 births, but worsened for level 2 births. For infants with birth weight less than 1,251 g, for whom transport rates from level 1 units are highest, mortality in level 1 births was higher than in level 2 births only until 18 hours of life; thereafter, level 2 mortality was higher.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6728585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  8 in total

1.  Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  G J Escobar; B Littenberg; D B Petitti
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  [The transportation problem--transportation in utero compared to transportation of the newborn infant].

Authors:  O Linderkamp; H T Versmold
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  The effect of congenital anomalies on mortality risk in white and black infants.

Authors:  L H Malcoe; G M Shaw; E J Lammer; A A Herman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The uses of epidemiology in the evaluation of regional perinatal services.

Authors:  N S Paneth; M R Rip
Journal:  Soz Praventivmed       Date:  1994

5.  Physician variations and the ancillary costs of neonatal intensive care.

Authors:  P H Perlstein; H D Atherton; E F Donovan; D K Richardson; U R Kotagal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Birth weight-specific causes of infant mortality, United States, 1980.

Authors:  J W Buehler; L T Strauss; C J Hogue; J C Smith
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1987 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

7.  The impact of maternal characteristics on the moderately premature infant: an antenatal maternal transport clinical prediction rule.

Authors:  D Dukhovny; S Dukhovny; D M Pursley; G J Escobar; M C McCormick; W Y Mao; J A F Zupancic
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 8.  Access to risk-appropriate hospital care and disparities in neonatal outcomes in racial/ethnic groups and rural-urban populations.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Jeannette Rogowski; Jochen Profit; Ciaran S Phibbs
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2021-03-21       Impact factor: 3.311

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.