Literature DB >> 6727424

Empiric therapy with moxalactam alone in patients with bacteremia.

W R Wilson, N K Henry, T F Keys, J P Anhalt, F R Cockerill, R S Edson, J E Geraci, P E Hermans, S M Muller, J E Rosenblatt.   

Abstract

Moxalactam was administered (20 mg/kg intravenously every 8 hours) as single-drug empiric antimicrobial therapy to 63 patients with bacteremia who were neither neutropenic nor immunosuppressed. Six patients (10%) had microorganisms that were susceptible to moxalactam and resistant to all other antimicrobial agents tested; two patients (3%) had microorganisms that were resistant to moxalactam and other agents tested. Of these 63 patients, 47 (75%) were cured with moxalactam therapy. Nine patients (14%) had breakthrough bacteremia while receiving other antimicrobial therapy and were cured subsequently with moxalactam therapy alone. The two major risk factors for failure of moxalactam therapy were polymicrobial bacteremia and an extrahepatic intra-abdominal source of infection; these two conditions frequently coexisted. Six of nine patients with polymicrobial bacteremia died. Superinfection (one pseudomonal, five enterococcal) was responsible for 6 of the 16 treatment failures. Enterococcal superinfection occurred exclusively among patients who had received relatively prolonged therapy with moxalactam for extrahepatic intra-abdominal infection, especially intraabdominal abscess. These five patients died, and postmortem examination showed that enterococcal superinfection was the major cause of death in all. Mild, reversible adverse reactions associated with use of moxalactam occurred in 14 of the 63 patients (22%). None had clinically overt bleeding. The use of moxalactam alone seems to be safe and effective and a cost-effective alternative empiric antimicrobial therapy for most patients with bacteremia who are not immunosuppressed or neutropenic and who are not at high risk of having Pseudomonas or polymicrobial bacteremia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6727424     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61427-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  5 in total

1.  Ceftazidime versus tobramycin-ticarcillin in the treatment of pneumonia and bacteremia.

Authors:  L A Cone; D R Woodard; D S Stoltzman; R G Byrd
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Gram-positive superinfections following beta-lactam chemotherapy: the significance of the enterococcus.

Authors:  R N Jones
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Antimicrobial activity of gentamicin in experimental enterococcal endocarditis.

Authors:  P M Sullam; M G Täuber; C J Hackbarth; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Influence of the developmental state of valvular lesions on the antimicrobial activity of cefotaxime in experimental enterococcal infections.

Authors:  P M Sullam; T A Drake; M G Täuber; C J Hackbarth; M A Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Impact of LY146032 on Streptococcus (Enterococcus) faecalis translocation in mice.

Authors:  S H Dougherty; D J Hentges; S W Casey; W R Thal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.