Literature DB >> 6726314

Topographic organization of somatosensory corticotectal influences in cat.

H R Clemo, B E Stein.   

Abstract

Using electrophysiological techniques, the present study demonstrated that substantial direct somatosensory cortical influences on the superior colliculus (SC) originate from three areas: a) SIV, b) para-SIV (the cortex adjacent to SIV but deeper in the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (AES) and for which no topography has yet been described), and c) the rostral suprasylvian sulcus. Influences also appeared to originate from SI and SII, but these may have been indirect. Detailed examination of the AES revealed that these corticotectal projections are topographically organized, and stimulation of a given cortical locus was observed to affect only those cells in the SC whose receptive fields overlapped those of cells at the stimulation site. A similar receptive-field register was found between the suprasylvian sulcus and the SC. Within this topographic pattern, considerable convergence was evident and an individual SC cell could be influenced from a surprisingly large cortical area. This was particularly evident within the representation of the forelimb. Thus, an SC cell with a receptive field covering the forelimb and paw could receive convergent input from many cortical cells with receptive fields covering all or restricted portions of this body region. Considerable corticotectal divergence also was observed within this general topographic scheme. For example, a given corticotectal site representing the digits sent projections to many different SC cells that included the digits within their receptive fields. These data are more consistent with a block-to-block than a point-to-point corticotectal projection. Somatosensory corticotectal projections excited only those SC cells that could also be activated by peripheral somatosensory stimuli. Similarly, the caudal AES, which contains auditory cells, excited only those SC cells activated also by peripheral auditory stimuli. Yet convergent influences from both auditory and somatosensory regions of the AES were observed in the SC cells that could be activated by both auditory and somatosensory stimuli. These data indicate that the AES is a major source of excitatory input to cells of the deep laminae of the SC. Since it is these deep laminae cells that project to premotor regions of the brain stem and the spinal cord, it is reasonable to suppose that the AES has a significant impact on the output signals of the SC that initiate the orientation responses to peripheral sensory stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6726314     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.5.843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

1.  Visual, auditory and somatosensory convergence in output neurons of the cat superior colliculus: multisensory properties of the tecto-reticulo-spinal projection.

Authors:  M A Meredith; M T Wallace; B E Stein
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The somatosensory intercollicular nucleus of the cat's mesencephalon.

Authors:  A Blomqvist; I Danielsson; U Norrsell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Development of multisensory integration from the perspective of the individual neuron.

Authors:  Barry E Stein; Terrence R Stanford; Benjamin A Rowland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Neonatal cortical ablation disrupts multisensory development in superior colliculus.

Authors:  Wan Jiang; Huai Jiang; Barry E Stein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Spatial heterogeneity of cortical receptive fields and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Brian N Carriere; David W Royal; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Do the Different Sensory Areas Within the Cat Anterior Ectosylvian Sulcal Cortex Collectively Represent a Network Multisensory Hub?

Authors:  M Alex Meredith; Mark T Wallace; H Ruth Clemo
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.286

7.  Crossmodal projections from somatosensory area SIV to the auditory field of the anterior ectosylvian sulcus (FAES) in Cat: further evidence for subthreshold forms of multisensory processing.

Authors:  M Alex Meredith; Leslie R Keniston; Lisa R Dehner; H Ruth Clemo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-25       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Spatial receptive field organization of multisensory neurons and its impact on multisensory interactions.

Authors:  Juliane Krueger; David W Royal; Matthew C Fister; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  A model of the temporal dynamics of multisensory enhancement.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rowland; Barry E Stein
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Temporal profiles of response enhancement in multisensory integration.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rowland; Barry E Stein
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.