Literature DB >> 6725596

Relation between intragastric bile acid concentration and mucosal abnormality in the stomach after vagotomy and gastroenterostomy for duodenal ulcer.

P C Watt, J M Sloan, T L Kennedy.   

Abstract

A high incidence of possible premalignant conditions of the gastric mucosa has been reported in the postoperative stomach and it has been suggested that bile plays a role in their pathogenesis. Fifty eight patients who had had a vagotomy and gastrojejunostomy between 1957 and 1967 underwent endoscopy and biopsy. Subsequently, samples of fasting and postprandial gastric juice were taken from all patients for analysis of total bile acid. The patients were divided into three histological groups: group 1 (24 patients) had gastritis or mucosal atrophy but no more than mild dysplasia; group 2 (23 patients) had intestinal metaplasia in one or more biopsies; group 3 (11 patients) had moderate or severe dysplasia in one or more biopsies. Group 2 and group 3 patients had higher fasting intragastric bile acid concentrations than group 1 (p less than 0.01 in both cases). There was no difference between fasting bile acid concentrations in groups 2 and 3. In the postprandial phase groups 2 and 3 also had higher peak intragastric concentrations than group 1 (p less than 0.01 in both cases). Again, there was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3. It is concluded that there is a relation between mucosal abnormality in the postoperative stomach and intragastric bile acid concentration. The possible aetiological link between bile acid and these mucosal abnormalities is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6725596      PMCID: PMC498770          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.37.5.506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  29 in total

1.  Carcinoma and possible precancerous changes of the gastric stump after billroth II resection.

Authors:  L Domellöf; S Eriksson; K G Janunger
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Enterogastric reflux; experimental and clinical study: a preliminary report.

Authors:  F Mosimann; B Burri; H Diserens; C Fontolliet; P Loup; R Mosimann
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl       Date:  1981

3.  Gastric mucosal dysplasia: what is its clinical significance?

Authors:  W Oehlert; P Keller; M Henke; M Strauch
Journal:  Front Gastrointest Res       Date:  1979

4.  Gastric carcinoma promoted by alkaline reflux gastritis -- with special reference to bile and other surfactants as promoters of postoperative gastric cancer.

Authors:  L Domellöf
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1979-04       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Microflora and deconjugation of bile acids in alkaline reflux after partial gastrectomy.

Authors:  L Domellöf; B S Reddy; J H Weisburger
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Gastric carcinoma after treatment of ulcer.

Authors:  D N Papachristou; N Agnanti; J G Fortner
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Precancerous conditions and epithelial dysplasia in the stomach.

Authors:  B C Morson; L H Sobin; E Grundmann; A Johansen; T Nagayo; A Serck-Hanssen
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1980-08       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Mucosal changes in the gastric stump 20-25 years after partial gastrectomy.

Authors:  E Schrumpf; A Serck-Hanssen; J Stadaas; S Aune; J Myren; M Osnes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1977-09-03       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Alkaline reflux gastritis. An objective assessment of its diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  W P Ritchie
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Carcinogenicity of N-nitroso compounds. Species and route differences in regard to organotropism.

Authors:  D Schmähl; M Habs
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.935

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.