Literature DB >> 6723449

Interaction between deaf preschoolers and unfamiliar hearing adults.

A R Lederberg.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to broaden our knowledge of the deaf child's social environment by providing a detailed description of the interactions between deaf children and women who were without experience or training with deaf people. 15 mothers interacted in a play situation with an unfamiliar deaf 5-year-old, an unfamiliar hearing 2-year-old, and an unfamiliar hearing 4 1/2-year-old. The women adapted their communication to the needs of the deaf children in several ways. The women used more visual communicative devices, touches, and simpler speech when communicating to the deaf children than when communicating to the hearing children. Despite these modifications, the women's initiations to the deaf children were only successful 46% of the time. In contrast, the women's initiations to the hearing children were successful more than 69% of the time. The women compensated for their low rate of success with the deaf children by initiating interactions more often to the deaf children than to the hearing children. As a result, the women and deaf children interacted as frequently as the women and hearing children. However, because the women and deaf children had considerable trouble maintaining their interactions for any length of time, they spent half as much time interacting as did the women and hearing children. Some reasons for this interactional pattern are presented. In addition, the implications of the results for the nature of " Motherese " are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6723449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  2 in total

1.  Parents' teaching strategies with their children: the effects of parental and child status variables.

Authors:  A D Pellegrini; G H Brody; I E Sigel
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1985-11

Review 2.  Motherese in interaction: at the cross-road of emotion and cognition? (A systematic review).

Authors:  Catherine Saint-Georges; Mohamed Chetouani; Raquel Cassel; Fabio Apicella; Ammar Mahdhaoui; Filippo Muratori; Marie-Christine Laznik; David Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.