Literature DB >> 6722668

Surgical complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy.

R Mustard, R Mackenzie, C Jamieson, G B Haber.   

Abstract

Endoscopic sphincterotomy (papillotomy) was performed in 289 patients for choledocholithiasis (250, of whom 223 had undergone cholecystectomy previously), papillary stenosis or spasm (32) and ampullary neoplasm (7). The complications encountered in 39 patients were hemorrhage (15 patients), perforation (4), hemorrhage and perforation (1), cholangitis (5), pancreatitis (11), impaction (1) and others (2). Laparotomy was required in seven of these patients for hemorrhage (two), perforation (two), hemorrhage and perforation (one), pancreatitis (one) and impaction (one). Bleeding required duodenotomy with an extension of the sphincterotomy incision to control hemorrhage, and a formal sutured sphincteroplasty. Perforation occurred at the junction of the distal bile duct and duodenum and was managed by mobilization of the duodenum, with T-tube drainage through the perforation, and sutured closure. A pancreatic abscess following pancreatitis required surgical drainage. An impacted Dormia basket with entrapped stone in the bile duct required duodenotomy for its removal. There was a high risk of perforation in those patients who did not have choledocholithiasis or who had had a previous Billroth II gastrectomy. There were two deaths but the overall complication rate of 2.4% is considered low, because many of the patients were elderly or debilitated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6722668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

1.  The successful surgical management of perforation after endoscopic sphincterotomy: report of two cases.

Authors:  H Isozaki; K Okajima; H Mizutani; Y Takeda
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Management of duodeno-pancreato-biliary perforations after ERCP: outcomes from an Italian tertiary referral center.

Authors:  Sergio Alfieri; Fausto Rosa; Caterina Cina; Antonio Pio Tortorelli; Andrea Tringali; Vincenzo Perri; Chiara Bellantone; Guido Costamagna; Giovanni Battista Doglietto
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy and surgical approaches in the treatment of the 'sump syndrome'.

Authors:  U A Marbet; G A Stalder; H Faust; F Harder; K Gyr
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review.

Authors:  Hao M Wu; Elijah Dixon; Gary R May; Francis R Sutherland
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 5.  Transmission of infection by flexible gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy.

Authors:  Julia Kovaleva; Frans T M Peters; Henny C van der Mei; John E Degener
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 26.132

6.  Treatment results of gastrointestinal perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  Tomasz Miłek; Piotr Ciostek; Piotr Porzycki; Magdalena Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-10-28

7.  Impact of completion of primary biliary procedure on outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic related perforation.

Authors:  S Srivastava; B C Sharma; A S Puri; S Sachdeva; L Jain; A Jindal
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2017-08-07
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.