Literature DB >> 6722047

Mobility of diesel versus non-diesel coal miners: some evidence on the healthy worker effect.

R G Ames, B Trent.   

Abstract

Workers who are particularly susceptible to the effects of their occupational exposure, from the perspective of the healthy worker effect, soon leave the workplace. The result of this mobility, called survival bias, is that cross sectional studies based on the survivors underestimate the true risk of occupational exposures. Two questions are addressed in this empirical study of the "survival bias" component of the "healthy worker" effect. Do miners with respiratory impairment or symptoms disproportionately leave jobs that have a potentially harmful respiratory exposure? And does the presence of an additional potentially harmful respiratory exposure, in this case diesel emissions, accelerate the rate of mobility for miners with respiratory impairment or symptoms? No confirmation was found for the survival effect in a study of 738 diesel and 420 non-diesel US underground coal miners. No additional increment in mobility was associated with exposure to both coal mine dust and diesel emissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6722047      PMCID: PMC1009283          DOI: 10.1136/oem.41.2.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ind Med        ISSN: 0007-1072


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of methods for assessing occupational hazards.

Authors:  C K Redmond; P P Breslin
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1975-05

2.  Estimating health risks in studies of the health effects of asbestos.

Authors:  P E Enterline
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1976-02

3.  The maximal expiratory flow-volume curve. Normal standards, variability, and effects of age.

Authors:  R J Knudson; R C Slatin; M D Lebowitz; B Burrows
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1976-05

4.  Standardized mortality ratios and the "healthy worker effect": Scratching beneath the surface.

Authors:  A J McMichael
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1976-03

5.  Response and follow-up bias in cohort studies.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Effects of selection on mortality.

Authors:  C C Seltzer; S Jablon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  Pitfalls in epidemiological research. An examination of the asbestos literature.

Authors:  P E Enterline
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1976-03

8.  Are coalminers, with low "risk factors" for ischaemic heart disease at greater risk of developing progressive massive fibrosis?

Authors:  A L Cochrane; F Moore; C B Moncrieff
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1982-08

9.  The "healthy worker effect"--fact or artifact?

Authors:  S Shindell; R F Weisberg; E E Giefer
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1978-12

10.  Low mortality rates in industrial cohort studies due to selection for work and survival in the industry.

Authors:  A J Fox; P F Collier
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1976-12
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Healthy Worker Effect Phenomenon: Revisited with Emphasis on Statistical Methods - A Review.

Authors:  Ritam Chowdhury; Divyang Shah; Abhishek R Payal
Journal:  Indian J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017 Jan-Apr
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.