Literature DB >> 6719840

Visible persistence as a function of spatial frequency, number of cycles and retinal area.

W J Lovegrove, G E Meyer.   

Abstract

Using a variety of measures it has been shown that processing time increases with increasing spatial frequency. Long and Sakitt (1981) [Vision Res. 21, 1387-1393] investigated duration of visible persistence as a function of both spatial frequency and number of cycles present. They concluded that number of cycles and not spatial frequency is the crucial variable in determining duration of visible persistence. The present paper investigates this issue in three experiments. Experiments 1 and 2 determined duration of visible persistence with spatial frequencies of 2, 4, 8 and 10 c/deg while holding both number of cycles and grating area constant in a dark surround and in a light surround. Stimulus durations of 50 and 300 msec were used in Experiments 1 and 2 respectively. The results at each stimulus duration showed an increase in duration of visible persistence with increasing spatial frequency similar to that found in most previous reports. This increase was less with a 300 than with a 50 msec stimulus duration. Whether the gratings were presented in a light or a dark surround had no significant effect. Experiment 3 showed that at 2 c/deg duration of visible persistence increased with increasing size of the grating stimuli when all stimulus sizes fell within the area of spatial summation. This effect was greater in a dark than in light surround. It is concluded that visible persistence does increase with spatial frequency. Previous results inconsistent with this conclusion are explained in terms of spatial summation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6719840     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(84)90128-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  4 in total

1.  Apparent duration and spatial structure.

Authors:  J Hughes; J R Lishman; D M Parker
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

2.  Persisting arguments about visual persistence: reply to Long.

Authors:  D E Irwin; J M Yeomans
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-03

3.  The varieties of visual persistence: comments on Yeomans and Irwin.

Authors:  G M Long
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-10

4.  Visible Persistence of Single-Transient Random Dot Patterns: Spatial Parameters Affect the Duration of Fading Percepts.

Authors:  Maximilian Bruchmann; Kathrin Thaler; Dirk Vorberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.