Literature DB >> 6717741

[Posterior longitudinal myelotomy as a surgical treatment of acute cervical spinal cord injury].

S Tachibana, K Okada, T Ohwada, K Yada.   

Abstract

Although it is of great tragedy to lose motor and sensory function of the spinal cord by spinal cord injury, there is no effective measure for complete cord lesions. In the central gray of the spinal cord at the region of injury, hemorrhagic necrosis and edema advance causing secondary damage to the spinal cord in rather early stage after injury. It has not been proved whether to remove necrotic tissue in the central gray matter can be effective to prevent secondary damage of the spinal cord or not. Operative result of six patients with acute physiologically complete cervical spinal cord lesion who have been subjected to posterior longitudinal myelotomy and removal of hematoma and necrotic tissue of the central gray of the spinal cord were evaluated. All of them admitted to Kitasato University Hospital within 24 hours after injury. They were five males and one female aged twenty to fifty-three. All the patients showed complete block of contrast medium on myelography at the level of one to two segments above the neurologically estimated level or injury of the spine, indicating marked swelling of the spinal cord. Average duration from injury to operation was sixteen hours ranging from six to thirty nine. Posterior longitudinal myelotomy was performed by using microsurgical technique. Skull traction was performed by using Crutchfield tongs for six weeks in five and twelve weeks in one of the patients. On admission forty mg of dexamethasone was used as steroid therapy followed gradual reduction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6717741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  No Shinkei Geka        ISSN: 0301-2603


  3 in total

1.  Creation of an intramedullary cavity by hemorrhagic necrosis removal 24 h after spinal cord contusion in rats for eventual intralesional implantation of restorative materials.

Authors:  Gabriel Guizar-Sahagun; Angelina Martinez-Cruz; Rebecca E Franco-Bourland; Eduardo Cruz-García; Alvaro Corona-Juarez; Araceli Diaz-Ruiz; Israel Grijalva; Horacio J Reyes-Alva; Ignacio Madrazo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Effect of Durotomy versus Myelotomy on Tissue Sparing and Functional Outcome after Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Zin Z Khaing; Lindsay N Cates; Dane M Dewees; Jeffrey E Hyde; Ashley Gaing; Zeinab Birjandian; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 3.  Clinical Neurorestorative Therapeutic Guidelines for Spinal Cord Injury (IANR/CANR version 2019).

Authors:  Hongyun Huang; Wise Young; Stephen Skaper; Lin Chen; Gustavo Moviglia; Hooshang Saberi; Ziad Al-Zoubi; Hari Shanker Sharma; Dafin Muresanu; Alok Sharma; Wagih El Masry; Shiqing Feng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.