Literature DB >> 6716116

Responses of thoracic spinothalamic and spinoreticular cells to coronary artery occlusion.

R W Blair, W S Ammons, R D Foreman.   

Abstract

Spinothalamic and spinoreticular neurons in the C8-T5 spinal segments were examined for responsiveness to occlusion of the left main, left circumflex (CX), or left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery in monkeys and cats. Four types of cell response to occlusion were observed, as follows: 1) cell activity increased (6 responses) or decreased (1 response) to myocardial ischemia produced by the occlusion; 2) cell activity increased at the onset of occlusion, adapted, and then increased again as ischemia developed (6 responses); 3) cell activity increased at the onset or release of occlusion, and rapidly adapted (13 responses) or remained elevated throughout the occlusion (2 responses); and 4) no response to occlusion (14 tests). Among the types of responses to occlusion, both the magnitude of increased cell activity as well as the spontaneous discharge rates were similar. There were no differences in types of response according to coronary artery ligated. Fourteen cells were tested for responses to separate occlusions of the LAD and CX. Ten cells responded differently to the two occlusions, and four cells exhibited similar responses. C-fiber input onto a neuron was significantly related to whether a cell exhibited a response to cardiac ischemia. Since every cell with C-fiber input did not respond to ischemia, however, this input was not sufficient to predict whether a cell would respond to ischemia. All cells had somatic fields, and all cells responded to noxious stimulation of the somatic field. Some cells also received input from hair movement. The modality of the effective somatic stimulus was not related to type of response to coronary artery occlusion. Spinothalamic and spinoreticular neurons responded similarly to occlusion. Type of response was neither related to cell location in spinal cord nor to projection site in brain. We conclude that spinothalamic and spinoreticular neurons respond to coronary artery occlusion. Different neurons may receive input from different regions of the heart as well as from different types of visceral afferents, resulting in various responses to occlusion. The population of cells excited from ischemia of a given portion of myocardium may determine how the brain interprets the noxious information and refers pain to different somatic structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6716116     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.4.636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  9 in total

1.  Spinal cord processing of cardiac nociception: are there sex differences between male and proestrous female rats?

Authors:  Janine M Little; Chao Qin; Jay P Farber; Robert D Foreman
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Thalamic mechanisms of chest pain in the absence of cardiac pathology.

Authors:  F A Lenz; P M Dougherty; T A Traill
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Neuroanatomy of the pain system and of the pathways that modulate pain.

Authors:  W D Willis; K N Westlund
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.177

4.  Relationship of membrane properties, spike burst responses, laminar location, and functional class of dorsal horn neurons recorded in vitro.

Authors:  Patrick M Dougherty; Jinghong Chen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Referred Somatic Hyperalgesia Mediates Cardiac Regulation by the Activation of Sympathetic Nerves in a Rat Model of Myocardial Ischemia.

Authors:  Xiang Cui; Guang Sun; Honglei Cao; Qun Liu; Kun Liu; Shuya Wang; Bing Zhu; Xinyan Gao
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 5.271

Review 6.  Studying Cardiac Neural Network Dynamics: Challenges and Opportunities for Scientific Computing.

Authors:  Nil Z Gurel; Koustubh B Sudarshan; Sharon Tam; Diana Ly; J Andrew Armour; Guy Kember; Olujimi A Ajijola
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Effects of transient coronary artery occlusion on canine intrinsic cardiac neuronal activity.

Authors:  M H Huang; J L Ardell; B D Hanna; S G Wolf; J A Armour
Journal:  Integr Physiol Behav Sci       Date:  1993 Jan-Mar

8.  Responses of lateral thalamic neurons to algesic chemical stimulation of the cat knee joint.

Authors:  W D Hutchison; M A Lühn; R F Schmidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Activation of feline spinal neurones by potentiated ventricular contractions and other mechanical cardiac stimuli.

Authors:  R W Blair; R D Foreman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 5.182

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.