Literature DB >> 671472

The 'no lose' philosophy in medicine.

S Galbraith.   

Abstract

This article as the series title suggests focuses our attention on decisions, both medical and ethical, which face doctors and related personnel in the medical profession daily. Many of these decisions take the form of a choice to one thing or another without being very sure of the outcome of either action. Mr Galbraith explores the pros and cons of what he calls the 'no lose' philosophy in medicine and which plays a large part in medical decision making. He concludes that possibly we may need a new philosophy rather than continuing to use more and more of our resources on care, which is perhaps being carried out as a means of avoiding making value judgements and thus possibly, prevents us from solving some of today's difficult ethical problems.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 671472      PMCID: PMC1154632          DOI: 10.1136/jme.4.2.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  1 in total

1.  Predicting outcome in individual patients after severe head injury.

Authors:  B Jennett; G Teasdale; R Braakman; J Minderhoud; R Knill-Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-05-15       Impact factor: 79.321

  1 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Philosophy of medicine in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  David Lamb; Susan M Easton
Journal:  Metamedicine       Date:  1982-02

2.  Cost effectiveness of routine postmortem histology.

Authors:  W A Reid
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Paradoxical traps in therapeutics: some dilemmas in medical ethics.

Authors:  U Lowental
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.903

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.