Literature DB >> 6714290

Should the acetylator phenotype be determined when prescribing hydralazine for hypertension?

L E Ramsay, J H Silas, J D Ollerenshaw, G T Tucker, F C Phillips, S Freestone.   

Abstract

The role of acetylator phenotype in determining the response to hydralazine when it was added to diuretic and beta-blocker at doses not exceeding 200 mg daily was examined in 57 hypertensive patients. 81% of rapid acetylators needed 200 mg hydralazine daily compared to 38% of slow acetylators (p less than 0.01). Despite higher doses of hydralazine the blood pressure was controlled in only 27% of rapid acetylators compared to 65% of slow acetylators (p less than 0.02). The relation of acetylator phenotype to blood pressure response was statistically independent of initial blood pressure, age, sex, body weight and serum creatinine (p less than 0.005). Current recommendations on hydralazine dosage are unsatisfactory for the 40% of hypertensive patients who are rapid acetylators. We suggest measurement of the acetylator phenotype in patients who respond incompletely to 200 mg hydralazine daily. About 70% of these patients will be rapid acetylators in whom the dose of hydralazine can be increased safely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6714290     DOI: 10.1007/bf00546706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  13 in total

Review 1.  Late toxicity to hydralazine resembling systemic lupus erythematosus or rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  H M Perry
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Relation of hydralazine plasma concentration to dosage and hypotensive action.

Authors:  R Zacest; J Koch-Weser
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1972 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Hydrallazine in hypertension: is there a safe dose?

Authors:  R F Bing; G I Russell; H Thurston; J D Swales
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1980-08-02

Review 4.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of hydralazine.

Authors:  T M Ludden; J L McNay; A M Shepherd; M S Lin
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  The hypotensive response to hydralazine, in triple therapy, is not related to acetylator phenotype.

Authors:  M J Vandenburg; P Wright; J Holmes; H J Rogers; R A Ahmad
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  Hydrallazine with beta-blocker and diuretic in the treatment of hypertension. A double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  S Kalowski; A S Hua; J A Whitworth; P Kincaid-Smith
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1979-10-20       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Contribution of atenolol, bendrofluazide, and hydrallazine to management of severe hypertension.

Authors:  R G Wilcox; J R Mitchell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-08-27

8.  Determination of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole (co-trimoxazole) in body fluids of man by means of high-performance liquid chromatography.

Authors:  T B Vree; Y A Hekster; A M Baars; J E Damsma; E V Kleijin
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1978-07-01

9.  The 'third drug' trial: a comparative study of anti-hypertensive agents added to treatment when blood pressure is uncontrolled by a beta-blocker plus thiazide diuretic.

Authors:  D McAreavey; L E Ramsay; L Latham; A R Lorimer; D McLaren; J L Reid; J I Robertson; M P Robertson; R J Weir
Journal:  J Hypertens Suppl       Date:  1983-12

10.  Diuretic and beta-blocker in hypertension--then what?

Authors:  L E Ramsay
Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond       Date:  1980-10
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Inborn 'errors' of drug metabolism. Pharmacokinetic and clinical implications.

Authors:  M S Lennard; G T Tucker; H F Woods
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Allopathy--the therapeutic legacy.

Authors:  G D Johnston
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.568

3.  Comparison of once daily endralazine with placebo in the treatment of hypertension uncontrolled by a beta-blocker and diuretic.

Authors:  J C McGourty; J H Silas; J Pidgeon
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 4.  Genetically determined adverse drug reactions involving metabolism.

Authors:  M S Lennard
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 5.  Drug interactions in hypertensive patients. Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and genetic considerations.

Authors:  Y W Lam; A M Shepherd
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Genetically determined variability in acetylation and oxidation. Therapeutic implications.

Authors:  D W Clark
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 9.546

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.