Literature DB >> 6714069

Accommodative stimulus/response function in human amblyopia.

K J Ciuffreda, S C Hokoda, G K Hung, J L Semmlow.   

Abstract

Three parameters are essential to describe static accommodative behavior in a comprehensive, quantitative manner: the slope of the stimulus/response curve, the depth of focus, and the tonic response. These parameters were obtained in amblyopes, former amblyopes, strabismus without amblyopia, and normals. Results showed that the accommodative response in the amblyopic eye was characterized by a reduction in the slope of the stimulus/response curve and increased depth of focus. Similar abnormalities but of lesser magnitude were found in the non-dominant eye of some former amblyopes and some strabismus without amblyopia. Orthoptic therapy always increased the slope of the stimulus/response curve in the amblyopic eye. We believe that the reduced accommodative responses found in amblyopic eyes reflect a primary sensory loss over the central retinal region that occurs as a result of prolonged, early, abnormal visual experience associated with the presence of strabismus and/or anisometropia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6714069     DOI: 10.1007/bf00155676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  47 in total

1.  Primary and secondary deviation in comitant squint.

Authors:  M J URIST
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1959-11       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  Observations on the normal subjective amplitude of accommodation.

Authors:  M J TURNER
Journal:  Br J Physiol Opt       Date:  1958-04

3.  Some recent clinical observations and training procedures in functionally amblyopic patients.

Authors:  A Sherman
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1970-07

4.  The spectacle amplitude of accommodation of children aged six to ten.

Authors:  R M Wold
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1967-10

5.  On the nature of the neural abnormality in human amblyopia; neural aberrations and neural sensitivity loss.

Authors:  R F Hess; F W Campbell; T Greenhalgh
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1978-11-30       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Differences in vernier discrimination for grating between strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes.

Authors:  D M Levi; S Klein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  The influence of the spatial distribution of a target on the dynamic response and fluctuations of the accommodation of the human eye.

Authors:  L J Bour
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The threshold contrast sensitivity function in strabismic amblyopia: evidence for a two type classification.

Authors:  R F Hess; E R Howell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  The fixation pattern of the light-adapted and dark-adapted amblyopic eye.

Authors:  T Lawwill
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Processing delays in amblyopic eyes: evidence from saccadic latencies.

Authors:  K J Ciuffreda; R V Kenyon; L Stark
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1978-03
View more
  16 in total

1.  Static and dynamic measurements of accommodation in individuals with down syndrome.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Ruth E Manny; Adrian Glasser; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Accommodative performance of children with unilateral amblyopia.

Authors:  Vivian Manh; Angela M Chen; Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch; Susan A Cotter; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Static vergence and accommodation: population norms and orthoptics effects.

Authors:  G K Hung; K J Ciuffreda; J L Semmlow
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-02-28       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Accommodative stimulus-response curves to low-pass filtered natural images.

Authors:  José J Esteve-Taboada; Paula Bernal-Molina; Robert Montés-Micó; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Outcome of conventional treatment for adult amblyopia.

Authors:  Fumiko Kishimoto; Chiaki Fujii; Yoshie Shira; Kayoko Hasebe; Ichiro Hamasaki; Hiroshi Ohtsuki
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.447

7.  Tonic accommodation predicts closed-loop accommodation responses.

Authors:  Chunming Liu; Stefanie A Drew; Eric Borsting; Amy Escobar; Lawrence Stark; Christopher Chase
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The influence of first near-spectacle reading correction on accommodation and its interaction with convergence.

Authors:  Indu Vedamurthy; Wendy W Harrison; Yue Liu; Ian Cox; Clifton M Schor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Accommodative Stimulus-Response Curve with Emoji Symbols.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; José J Esteve Taboada; Paula Bernal-Molina; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Asymmetrical accommodation in hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia.

Authors:  Sonia Toor; Anna M Horwood; Patricia Riddell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.