Literature DB >> 6711724

Notification of workers at high risk: an emerging public health problem.

P A Schulte, K Ringen.   

Abstract

During the last two decades, an increasing number of epidemiologic studies have found cohorts of workers to be at high risk of work-related chronic diseases, especially cancers. These studies frequently have led to the broad recognition of occupational hazards and eventually to the prevention of exposures to such hazards. Generally, however, the individual cohort members found to be at high risk have not been notified of study results, and programs of medical intervention or of palliative services directed at these individual workers have not been developed. Recently, the issue of whether or not workers have a right to be notified more directly about known health hazards to which they may have been exposed has emerged as a major, unresolved question in public health policy. Issues of concern include the criteria that should guide notifications; whom, when, and how to notify; and who should pay for notification and follow-up services. This commentary discusses the scientific, ethical, economic, and institutional aspects of worker notification, and describes three new demonstration projects that have provided notification and intervention for workers at high risk of bladder, colon, and lung cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6711724      PMCID: PMC1651614          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.74.5.485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  24 in total

1.  Human rights and the prevention of cancer.

Authors:  Alan Gewirth
Journal:  Am Philos Q       Date:  1980-04

2.  Carcinogens in the workplace.

Authors:  D Schottenfeld; J F Haas
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1979 May-Jun       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Lung cancer and mesothelioma during prospective surveillance of 1249 asbestos insulation workers, 1963-1974.

Authors:  I J Selikoff
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Trends in survival rates of patients with cancer.

Authors:  S J Cutler; M H Myers; S B Green
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-17       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Edwin Chadwick, the market ideology, and sanitary reform: on the nature of the 19th-century public health movement.

Authors:  K Ringen
Journal:  Int J Health Serv       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.663

6.  The role of early diagnosis is controlling large bowel cancer.

Authors:  P Sherlock; S J Winawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Screening for disease: Definitions and criteria.

Authors:  L G Whitby
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1974-10-05       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Further cytologic and histologic studies of bladder lesions in workers exposed to para-aminodiphenyl: progress report.

Authors:  L G Koss; M R Melamed; E Kelly
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  The right to know.

Authors:  H J Magnuson
Journal:  Arch Environ Health       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb

10.  Increased absenteeism from work after detection and labeling of hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R B Haynes; D L Sackett; D W Taylor; E S Gibson; A L Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1978-10-05       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  10 in total

1.  Contribution of occupational exposure to cancer: recent developments.

Authors:  M J Gardner
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1991-04

2.  Drake Chemical Workers' Health Registry: coping with community tension over toxic exposures.

Authors:  L C Leviton; G M Marsh; E Talbott; D Pavlock; C Callahan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The rising long-term trend in occupational injury rates.

Authors:  J C Robinson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Ethical conflict in the practice of occupational medicine.

Authors:  P W Brandt-Rauf
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1989-01

5.  Notifying workers at risk: the politics of the right-to-know.

Authors:  R Bayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  COSH: a grass-roots public health movement.

Authors:  C Levenstein; L I Boden; D H Wegman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Communicating risks after exposure has ended: former workers' perspectives on PCBs.

Authors:  Kaori Fujishiro; Amy Mobley; Everett Lehman
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2013-01-01

Review 8.  12th meeting of the Scientific Group on Methodologies for the Safety Evaluation of Chemicals: susceptibility to environmental hazards.

Authors:  J C Barrett; H Vainio; D Peakall; B D Goldstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Ethical, social, and legal issues surrounding studies of susceptible populations and individuals.

Authors:  C L Soskolne
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Occupational safety and health criteria for responsible development of nanotechnology.

Authors:  P A Schulte; C L Geraci; V Murashov; E D Kuempel; R D Zumwalde; V Castranova; M D Hoover; L Hodson; K F Martinez
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.253

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.