Literature DB >> 6711690

Public opinion of forensic psychiatry following the Hinckley verdict.

D Slater, V P Hans.   

Abstract

The authors obtained opinions of forensic psychiatry in a community survey following the not guilty by reason of insanity verdict in the Hinckley trial. A majority of respondents expressed little or no confidence in the specific psychiatric testimony in the Hinckley trial and only modest faith in the general ability of psychiatrists to determine legal insanity. Respondents' general and specific attitudes were strongly related. Younger people and women were more positive in their views of psychiatry in the courtroom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6711690     DOI: 10.1176/ajp.141.5.675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0002-953X            Impact factor:   18.112


  2 in total

1.  WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists.

Authors:  Norman Sartorius; Wolfgang Gaebel; Helen-Rose Cleveland; Heather Stuart; Tsuyoshi Akiyama; Julio Arboleda-Flórez; Anja E Baumann; Oye Gureje; Miguel R Jorge; Marianne Kastrup; Yuriko Suzuki; Allan Tasman
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Not a "Get Out of Jail Free Card": Comparing the Legal Supervision of Persons Found Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental Disorder and Convicted Offenders.

Authors:  Sandrine Martin; Yanick Charette; Chloé Leclerc; Michael C Seto; Tonia L Nicholls; Anne G Crocker
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.