Literature DB >> 6709368

Clinical inferences and decisions--II. Decision trees, receiver operator curves and subjective probability.

P Aspinall, A R Hill.   

Abstract

In patient management, clinical decisions follow a logical sequence which can be formally expressed as a decision tree in which the uncertainties associated with each alternative outcome may be made explicit using Bayes' theorem. Where test data is used in the formulation of a decision, the uncertainty associated with the information it conveys may be modified by changing the pass/fail criterion to alter the false positive and false negative error rate. Classical procedures based on information theory are described to illustrate how this may be achieved for any test. When hard data is not available to permit such an approach, the clinician must rely on his own past experience or that of a colleague. Several methods are available for quantifying such experience by estimating subjective probabilities associated with an action or test result. Two simple methods are described for deriving subjective probabilities for subsequent use within a Bayesian decision model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6709368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  4 in total

1.  10-Hz flash visual evoked potentials predict post-cataract extraction visual acuity.

Authors:  J V Odom; R Hobson; J T Coldren; G M Chao; G W Weinstein
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Preoperative prediction of postoperative visual acuity in patients with cataracts: a quantitative review.

Authors:  J V Odom; G M Chao; G W Weinstein
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Developing and validating predictive decision tree models from mining chemical structural fingerprints and high-throughput screening data in PubChem.

Authors:  Lianyi Han; Yanli Wang; Stephen H Bryant
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 4.  Explaining variations in test ordering in primary care: protocol for a realist review.

Authors:  Claire Duddy; Geoffrey Wong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.