Literature DB >> 6709178

The effects of field size and luminance on contrast sensitivity differences between specifically reading disabled and normal children.

F Martin, W Lovegrove.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity functions were measured for normal and specifically disabled readers in experiments which varied either field size or luminance level. The nature of the differences between groups was unaffected by field size, implying that spatial summation in specifically disabled readers is normal. Increasing luminance, however, increased the range over which disabled readers are less sensitive than normal readers. The results are discussed in terms of possible differences in underlying mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6709178     DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(84)90009-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  14 in total

1.  Assessing the role of different spatial frequencies in word perception by good and poor readers.

Authors:  Geoffrey R Patching; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

2.  Contrast responsivity in MT+ correlates with phonological awareness and reading measures in children.

Authors:  Michal Ben-Shachar; Robert F Dougherty; Gayle K Deutsch; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms of psychological processes: What have we learned?

Authors:  K E Stanovich
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  1985-01

4.  Brain activity in visual cortex predicts individual differences in reading performance.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-11-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Visual and visuomotor performance in dyslexic children.

Authors:  K L Felmingham; L S Jakobson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Speed discrimination predicts word but not pseudo-word reading rate in adults and children.

Authors:  Keith L Main; Franco Pestilli; Aviv Mezer; Jason Yeatman; Ryan Martin; Stephanie Phipps; Brian Wandell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Spatial frequency processing and the prediction of reading ability: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  W Lovegrove; W Slaghuis; A Bowling; P Nelson; E Geeves
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

8.  Allocation of visual attention in good and poor readers.

Authors:  J R Brannan; M C Williams
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-01

9.  Double Trouble: Visual and Phonological Impairments in English Dyslexic Readers.

Authors:  Serena Provazza; Anne-Marie Adams; David Giofrè; Daniel John Roberts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-17

10.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.