The inflatable penile prosthesis, reoperation and patient satisfaction: a comparison of statistics obtained from patient record review with statistics obtained from intensive followup search.

Of 179 patients who received the inflatable penile prosthesis 43 per cent have required reoperation, 60 per cent of which were performed for mechanical failure. An attempt to evaluate the adequacy of chart review in assessing current function and patient satisfaction was made by comparing reports obtained by chart review to those obtained by direct patient interview. Results showed that if chart review alone was used malfunction would have been underestimated by 13 per cent and patient satisfaction overestimated by 21 per cent. The importance of direct followup in evaluating patients with the inflatable penile prosthesis is demonstrated.