Literature DB >> 6706503

The resistance of selected hyperacuity configurations to retinal image degradation.

R A Williams, J M Enoch, E A Essock.   

Abstract

Traditional visual acuity is based on resolution of stimulus features, whereas hyperacuity (ie, vernier acuity) is based on relative localization of stimulus features. Since resolution acuity is influenced severely by optical degradation, it is often not a suitable measure of the status of the retinal/neural visual system in conditions of optical degradation. In the present study, the authors investigate the effect of optical degradation on various relative localization tasks. Thresholds for three types of hyperacuity stimuli (line vernier, two-dot vernier, and line tilt) were measured under various degrees of image degradation, produced by viewing the targets through ground glass. The results indicate that when a hyperacuity stimulus is optically degraded, relative localization threshold increases only slightly for certain separations of the comparison features. In comparison with resolution acuity, hyperacuity threshold at the optimum feature separation is quite resistant to image degradation. This finding demonstrates a potential for the clinical application of hyperacuity as a test of visual function in the presence of cataracts and other media opacities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6706503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  [Diagnostics of metamorphopsia in retinal diseases of different origins].

Authors:  C Klatt; P Sendtner; L Ponomareva; J Hillenkamp; A Bunse; V-P Gabel; J Roider
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Induced intraocular light scatter and the sensitivity gradient of the normal visual field.

Authors:  J M Wood; J M Wild; S J Crews
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Vernier acuity and aging.

Authors:  V Lakshminarayanan; J M Enoch
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.031

4.  Manipulation of sensitivity in visual field investigation.

Authors:  D A Barnes; J M Wild; J G Flanagan; P A Good; S J Crews
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-06-30       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Relating vernier acuity and Snellen acuity in specific clinical populations.

Authors:  J M Enoch; E A Essock; R A Williams
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-08-15       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Joint application of hyperacuity perimetry and gap tests to assess visual function behind cataracts: initial trials.

Authors:  E A Essock; J M Enoch; R A Williams; M Barricks; S Raphael
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-09-30       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Orientation discrimination with macular changes associated with early AMD.

Authors:  Harold E Bedell; Jianliang Tong; Stanley Y Woo; Jon R House; Tammy Nguyen
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.973

8.  The effect of blur on cortical responses to global form and motion.

Authors:  Eliza A Burton; John Wattam-Bell; Gary S Rubin; Janette Atkinson; Oliver Braddick; Marko Nardini
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Vision through nuclear and posterior subcapsular cataract.

Authors:  P Baraldi; J M Enoch; S Raphael
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Precision of position signals for letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.