Literature DB >> 6706083

Piecemeal snare excision of large sessile colon and rectal polyps: is it adequate?

S Nivatvongs, D C Snover, D T Fang.   

Abstract

This study analyzes 28 consecutive patients with large sessile polyps snared piecemeal from the colon and rectum. The sections were examined to determine the adequacy of orientation and margin of excision. Orientation was judged excellent in five, good in 12, fair in six, and poor in five cases. The margin of excision was judged adequate in 23 of 28 cases. Five of eight patients with invasive carcinoma underwent bowel resection, and no residual tumor was found in the resected specimens. Of the remaining 20 patients without carcinoma, five had residual tumor or recurrences, with follow-up from 6 months to 6 years (average, 18 months). All of them underwent rebiopsies and electrocoagulation. None of the residual tumor or recurrences showed evidence of malignancy. Piecemeal snare excision of large sessile polyps of the large bowel appears to be an adequate procedure for most patients. A close follow-up with colonoscopy or proctoscopy is essential because residual tumor or recurrences are common.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6706083     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(84)72287-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  16 in total

1.  Recurrence after endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for large sessile colorectal polyps.

Authors:  Guh Jung Seo; Dae Kyung Sohn; Kyung Su Han; Chang Won Hong; Byung Chang Kim; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Hee Jin Chang; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors.

Authors:  Kinichi Hotta; Takahiro Fujii; Yutaka Saito; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the colorectum: Feasibility in the Canadian setting.

Authors:  Marietta Iacucci; Gregory Eustace; Toshio Uraoka; Yutaka Saito; Miriam Fort Gasia; Jon Love; Naohisa Yahagi
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  A giant rectal villous adenoma with a malicious intent.

Authors:  Maen Aboul Hosn; Nafisa Abdel-Hafiez; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Abir Al-Ahmadie; Ahmad Antar; Haifaa Dbouk; Hassan El Farran; Mahmoud El-Sawy Mohamed; Khaled Rida; Deborah Mukherji; Eileen M O'Reilly; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2013-09

5.  Endoscopic treatment of adenomas.

Authors:  J D Waye
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Giant adenomas of the rectum: complete resection by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Authors:  Hartmut Schäfer; Stefan E Baldus; Arnulf H Hölscher
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Patient management after endoscopic removal of the cancerous colon adenoma.

Authors:  W O Richards; W A Webb; S J Morris; R C Davis; L McDaniel; L Jones; S Littauer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  Therapeutic colonoscopy.

Authors:  K A Forde
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Efficacy, risk factors and complications of endoscopic polypectomy: ten year experience at a single center.

Authors:  Pierluigi Consolo; Carmelo Luigiano; Giuseppe Strangio; Maria-Grazia Scaffidi; Giuseppa Giacobbe; Giovanna Di Giuseppe; Agata Zirilli; Luigi Familiari
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery in large, sessile adenomas of the rectum. A 10-year experience.

Authors:  S Said; D Stippel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.