Literature DB >> 6706021

Sound field audiometry: recommended stimuli and procedures.

G Walker, H Dillon, D Byrne.   

Abstract

Comprehensive recommendations are presented for conducting sound field audiometry with frequency specific stimuli. These recommendations are primarily based on a series of investigations by the authors. The rationale for each recommendation is presented, together with a brief overview of the supporting research. The preferred stimuli are frequency modulation tones, triangularly or sinusoidally modulated at a rate of about 20 Hz, or suitably generated narrow bands of noise. The optimal bandwidths of the stimuli, expressed in percentages of the center frequency, vary with frequency. Stimuli suitable for most purposes have bandwidths ranging from about 30% at 0.25 kHz to about 10% at 4 kHz. Stimuli having narrower or broader bandwidths are desirable for some special purposes. The test room should be as nonreverberant as possible and the subject should be seated on an adjustable height chair with headrest. The control microphone method of calibration is preferred but a method is also presented for carrying out the traditional precalibration procedure. The SPL of the complex stimulus should be taken as the peak deflections on a sound level meter set to "RMS-FAST." A conversion table is presented which allows thresholds obtained in the sound field to be expressed as dB HTL. With the materials and methods described here it is possible to achieve the same reliability for sound field testing as for audiometry under earphones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6706021     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-198401000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  8 in total

1.  Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Spatial separation benefit for unaided and aided listening.

Authors:  Jayne B Ahlstrom; Amy R Horwitz; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Optimizing sound localization with hearing AIDS.

Authors:  D Byrne; W Noble
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  1998-06

4.  Evaluation of different signal processing options in unilateral and bilateral cochlear freedom implant recipients using R-Space background noise.

Authors:  Alison M Brockmeyer; Lisa G Potts
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Development of Sound Field Audiometry System for Small Audiometric Booths and Comparison of Its Equivalence With Traditional System.

Authors:  Eun Kyung Jung; Young Mi Choi; Eun Jung Kim; Sungsu Lee; Hyong-Ho Cho
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 3.372

6.  Auditory stream segregation of amplitude-modulated narrowband noise in cochlear implant users and individuals with normal hearing.

Authors:  Alexandria F Matz; Yingjiu Nie; Harley J Wheeler
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02

Review 7.  Effect of stimuli, transducers and gender on acoustic change complex.

Authors:  Hemanth Narayan Shetty; Manjula Puttabasappa
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2012-08-23

8.  Comparison of Acceptable Noise Level Generated Using Different Transducers and Response Modes.

Authors:  Liang Xia; Jingchun He; Yuanyuan Sun; Yi Chen; Qiong Luo; Haibo Shi; Yanmei Feng; Shankai Yin
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.599

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.