Literature DB >> 670555

Asymptotic threshold shift in chinchillas exposed to impulse noise.

E A Blakeslee, K Hynson, R P Hamernik, D Henderson.   

Abstract

Five monaural chinchillas were exposed to a repetitive, reverberant, impulse noise for ten days. The impulse-noise source was a mechanized hammer hitting a steel plate at a rate of 1/s. The average, peak over pressure within the holding cage was 113 dB SPL. Auditory thresholds were determined before and after exposure at 0.5, 1, 1.4 2, 2.8, 4, 8, and 16 kHz utilizing shock-avoidance conditioning. During exposure thresholds were monitored on a daily basis at 0.5 and 8 kHz. Within one hour from the start of the exposure, threshold shift at 8 kHz had reached an asymptotic level, while threshold shift at 0.5 kHz leveled off after 24 h of exposure. Asymptotic threshold shift (ATS) levels of both frequencies varied between 30 and 50 dB across animals. Median threshold shift for both frequencies recovered to within 10 dB of normal after 40 days of recovery. Maximum permanent threshold shift (PTS) was at 2 and 2.8 KHZ with median PTS of 17 and 13 dB, respectively. After final thresholds were obtained (50-70 days), the cochleas were examined histologically using the surface preparation technique. A comparison is made between impulse-noise-induced ATS and ATS produced by continuous-noise sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 670555     DOI: 10.1121/1.381767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  The value of a kurtosis metric in estimating the hazard to hearing of complex industrial noise exposures.

Authors:  Wei Qiu; Roger P Hamernik; Robert I Davis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  An investigation of biological response induced by intermittent noise (trapezoidal noise).

Authors:  K Yamamura; K Aoshima
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1980

3.  Selective Inner Hair Cell Dysfunction in Chinchillas Impairs Hearing-in-Noise in the Absence of Outer Hair Cell Loss.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi; Dalian Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-12-21

4.  Effect of Selective Carboplatin-Induced Inner Hair Cell Loss on Temporal Integration in Chinchillas.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Celia D Escabi; Andie Zang; Karen Pawlowski; Edward Lobarinas
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 5.  A brief history of hair cell regeneration research and speculations on the future.

Authors:  Edwin W Rubel; Stephanie A Furrer; Jennifer S Stone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Prolonged noise exposure-induced auditory threshold shifts in rats.

Authors:  Guang-Di Chen; Brandon Decker; Vijaya Prakash Krishnan Muthaiah; Adam Sheppard; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Insensitivity of the audiogram to carboplatin induced inner hair cell loss in chinchillas.

Authors:  Edward Lobarinas; Richard Salvi; Dalian Ding
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-06       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Correlation of Histomorphometric Changes with Diffusion Tensor Imaging for Evaluation of Blast-Induced Auditory Neurodegeneration in Chinchilla.

Authors:  Kathiravan Kaliyappan; Johan Nakuci; Marilena Preda; Ferdinand Schweser; Sarah Muldoon; Vijaya Prakash Krishnan Muthaiah
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 5.269

9.  Prolonged low-level noise exposure reduces rat distortion product otoacoustic emissions above a critical level.

Authors:  Deng-Ling Zhao; Adam Sheppard; Massimo Ralli; Xiaopeng Liu; Richard Salvi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The chinchilla animal model for hearing science and noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Monica Trevino; Edward Lobarinas; Amanda C Maulden; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.840

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.