Literature DB >> 6705428

The EMIT FreeLevel ultrafiltration technique compared with equilibrium dialysis and ultracentrifugation to determine protein binding of phenytoin.

M Oellerich, H Müller-Vahl.   

Abstract

A rapid new ultrafiltration technique (EMIT FreeLevel System I) for the routine measurement of unbound phenytoin concentrations was evaluated. The precision of this procedure was sufficient (between-days coefficient of variation, 11.7%). The results obtained by the ultrafiltration technique for the percentage of free phenytoin in samples from about 40 non-uraemic patients treated with this drug were in good agreement with those determined by ultracentrifugation and equilibrium dialysis (ultrafiltration vs ultracentrifugation, y = 0.94x + 0.60%; ultrafiltration vs equilibrium dialysis, y = 1.02x - 0.60%). The mean value of the results obtained by ultracentrifugation was significantly about 8% lower than that observed with equilibrium dialysis, apparently due to a sedimentation of free phenytoin during ultracentrifugation. With the methods used in our study, the mean values of percentage phenytoin bound to serum proteins obtained in samples from non-uraemic patients ranged from 91.8 to 92.8%. All 3 methods yielded similar binding curves for phenytoin, with spiked human pool sera containing albumin concentrations between 19 and 45 g/L. A rise of the unbound phenytoin fraction was observed with increasing total concentrations of the drug and a decrease of the albumin concentration. With samples from non-uraemic patients (n = 203), a rather good correlation was found between free and total phenytoin concentrations (r = 0.91). In a number of patients (n = 11), free phenytoin concentrations correlated better than total phenytoin concentrations with the clinical status. Patients with free phenytoin concentrations of less than or equal to 2.1 micrograms/ml and total phenytoin concentrations above the therapeutic range did not show signs of toxicity. From the results of our study it is concluded that the EMIT FreeLevel ultrafiltration technique is very well-suited for a rapid and reliable separation of unbound phenytoin. In patients with altered protein binding or an unusual clinical response, free phenytoin determinations appear to be necessary for proper interpretation of total phenytoin levels and rational dosage adjustment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6705428     DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198400091-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0312-5963            Impact factor:   6.447


  16 in total

1.  Determination of phenobarbital and phenytoin in serum by a mechanized enzyme immunoassay (EMIT) in comparison with a gas-liquid chromatographic method.

Authors:  M Oellerich; W R Külpmann; R Haeckel; R Heyer
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1977-06

2.  Plasma protein binding of diphenylhydantoin in man. Interaction with other drugs and the effect of temperature and plasma dilution.

Authors:  P K Lunde; A Rane; S J Yaffe; L Lund; F Sjöqvist
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1970 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.875

3.  Serum concentrations of free diphenylhydantoin and their relationship to clinical intoxication.

Authors:  H E Booker; B Darcey
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 5.864

4.  Evaluation of methods to determine protein-binding of drugs. Equilibrium dialysis, ultrafiltration, ultracentrifugation, gel filtration.

Authors:  H Kurz; H Trunk; B Weitz
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1977-07

Review 5.  Drug protein binding and the nephrotic syndrome.

Authors:  R Gugler; D L Azarnoff
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Importance of protein binding for the interpretation of serum or plasma drug concentrations.

Authors:  D J Greenblatt; E M Sellers; J Koch-Weser
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.126

7.  A multivariate approach for the biometric comparison of analytical methods in clinical chemistry.

Authors:  U Feldmann; B Schneider; H Klinkers; R Haeckel
Journal:  J Clin Chem Clin Biochem       Date:  1981-03

8.  Binding of phenytoin, L-tryptophan and O-methyl red to albumin. Unexpected effect of albumin concentration on the binding of phenytoin and L-tryptophan.

Authors:  C J Bowmer; W E Lindup
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1978-03-15       Impact factor: 5.858

9.  Plasma albumin concentration and diphenylhydantoin binding in man.

Authors:  R J Porter; R B Layzer
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1975-05

Review 10.  Drug interactions with valproic acid.

Authors:  R H Levy; K M Koch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 9.546

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Nonlinear pharmacokinetics: clinical Implications.

Authors:  T M Ludden
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Analysis of free drug fractions using near-infrared fluorescent labels and an ultrafast immunoextraction/displacement assay.

Authors:  Corey M Ohnmacht; John E Schiel; David S Hage
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Free drug concentration monitoring in clinical practice. Rationale and current status.

Authors:  C K Svensson; M N Woodruff; J G Baxter; D Lalka
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in patients with various degrees of renal function.

Authors:  K A Rodvold; R A Blum; J H Fischer; H Z Zokufa; J C Rotschafer; K B Crossley; L J Riff
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Enprofylline: pharmacokinetics and comparison with theophylline of acute effects on bronchial reactivity in normal subjects.

Authors:  T B Kluge; M Oellerich; G Schumann; G W Sybrecht
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Pharmacokinetics, plasma protein binding and urinary excretion of N omega-nitro-L-arginine in rats.

Authors:  M A Tabrizi-Fard; H L Fung
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 8.739

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.