Literature DB >> 6705167

Endocardial activation of left bundle branch block.

J A Vassallo, D M Cassidy, F E Marchlinski, A E Buxton, H L Waxman, J U Doherty, M E Josephson.   

Abstract

Endocardial catheter mapping was performed in 18 patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Four patients had no organic heart disease (group I), six had cardiomyopathy (group II), and eight had coronary artery disease and previous infarction (group III). Twelve patients had one septal site of left ventricular endocardial breakthrough, while six had two left ventricular endocardial breakthrough sites, with one site always being septal. There was no significant difference among the groups with respect to time of left ventricular breakthrough (group I, 44 msec after the onset of the QRS complex; group II, 58 msec; and group III, 51 msec). Total left ventricular endocardial activation time was significantly longer in group III (119 msec) than group I (81 msec; p less than .05) and group II (61 msec; p less than .001). Duration of total right ventricular endocardial activation was 36 msec (seven patients). The final site of right ventricular activation was at 44 msec after the onset of the QRS complex. We conclude that (1) right ventricular activation occurs before initiation of left ventricular activation in patients with LBBB, (2) left ventricular endocardial activation in patients with LBBB most likely occurs as a result of right-to-left transseptal activation, (3) left ventricular endocardial activation sequence in patients with LBBB is heterogeneous, and (4) patients with coronary artery disease and LBBB have significantly longer total left ventricular endocardial activation times than patients with no organic heart disease or those with cardiomyopathies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6705167     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.69.5.914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  37 in total

1.  Mapping of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging.

Authors:  F W Prinzen; W C Hunter; B T Wyman; E R McVeigh
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Non-contact left ventricular endocardial mapping for cardiac resynchronisation therapy: a "slow conduction" towards the fast solution.

Authors:  P Della Bella; C Carbucicchio
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Right ventricular pacing, mechanical dyssynchrony, and heart failure.

Authors:  Alan J Bank; Ryan M Gage; Kevin V Burns
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  [Improved identification of suitable patients for cardiac resynchronization therapy by transthoracic echocardiography].

Authors:  O-A Breithardt; A M Sinha
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2005-03

Review 5.  Biomechanics of cardiac electromechanical coupling and mechanoelectric feedback.

Authors:  Emily R Pfeiffer; Jared R Tangney; Jeffrey H Omens; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 6.  Targeting left ventricular lead placement to improve cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes.

Authors:  Jeffrey Liu; Evan Adelstein; Samir Saba
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Left bundle-branch block contraction patterns identified from radial-strain analysis predicts outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Chun-Li Wang; Chia-Tung Wu; Yung-Hsin Yeh; Lung-Sheng Wu; Yi-Hsin Chan; Chi-Tai Kuo; Pao-Hsien Chu; Lung-An Hsu; Wan-Jing Ho
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Cardiac resynchronization: insight from experimental and computational models.

Authors:  R C P Kerckhoffs; J Lumens; K Vernooy; J H Omens; L J Mulligan; T Delhaas; T Arts; A D McCulloch; F W Prinzen
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 9.  Does cardiac resynchronization therapy benefit patients with right bundle branch block: left ventricular free wall pacing: seldom right for right bundle branch block.

Authors:  Kenneth C Bilchick
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-06

Review 10.  Toward Sex-Specific Guidelines for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy?

Authors:  Robbert Zusterzeel; Kimberly A Selzman; William E Sanders; Kathryn M O'Callaghan; Daniel A Caños; Kevin Vernooy; Frits W Prinzen; Anton P M Gorgels; David G Strauss
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.