Literature DB >> 6705122

Anaerobic testing using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups.

N LaVoie, J Dallaire, S Brayne, D Barrett.   

Abstract

Recently, considerable attention has been focused on the measurement of maximal anaerobic power. The Evans-Quinney (1981) protocol which considers leg volume as well as body weight in establishing optimal load settings on the bicycle ergometer has been shown to result in significantly higher anaerobic power outputs than the body weight-relative Wingate protocol. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the anaerobic power outputs during bicycle ergometer work using the Wingate and Evans-Quinney protocols with and without toe stirrups. Fifty male physical education and varsity athletes (average age 22.6 years) volunteered to participate in this experiment. All subjects performed a total of four maximal 30-second anaerobic power tests utilizing the force settings established by the Wingate (load [L] = 0.075 kp/kg body weight) and Evans-Quinney (L = -0.4914-0.2151 (weight, kg) + 2.1124 (leg volume, litre) protocol. The subjects were randomly assigned to one of four counterbalanced orders of test administration. Analysis of data indicated significant differences (P less than or equal to .05) among the variables of: 5-second peak power (W), 30-second anaerobic capacity (W) and percent fatigue as a function of test protocol. Significantly higher values were obtained for all variables under the Evans-Quinney test procedure using toe stirrups while the Wingate test procedure without toe stirrups showed significantly lower values for all variables. It was concluded that the Evans-Quinney load setting protocol with toe stirrups resulted in significantly higher power measures than any of the other treatments tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6705122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Appl Sport Sci        ISSN: 0700-3978


  10 in total

1.  Blood lactate concentration following intermittent and continuous cycling tests of anaerobic capacity.

Authors:  L P Koziris; D L Montgomery
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

Review 2.  Cycle ergometry and maximal intensity exercise.

Authors:  E M Winter
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Familiarization Effects of an Elliptical All-out Test and the Wingate Test Based on Mechanical Power Indices.

Authors:  Ozgur Ozkaya
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  The measurement of maximal (anaerobic) power output on a cycle ergometer: a critical review.

Authors:  Tarak Driss; Henry Vandewalle
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 5.  Standard anaerobic exercise tests.

Authors:  H Vandewalle; G Pérès; H Monod
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.

Authors:  O Bar-Or
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  The effects of one- and two-legged exercise on the lactate and ventilatory threshold.

Authors:  P J Neary; H A Wenger
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1986

Review 8.  Physiology of ice hockey.

Authors:  D L Montgomery
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 11.136

9.  The Test-Retest Reliability of New Generation Power Indices of Wingate All-Out Test.

Authors:  Ozgur Ozkaya; Gorkem Aybars Balci; Hakan As; Emre Vardarli
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-04-07

10.  Sex-Specific Longitudinal Modeling of Short-Term Power in 11- to 18-Year-Olds.

Authors:  Neil Armstrong; J O Welsman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.411

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.