Literature DB >> 6703887

Diagnostic ultrasound: its use in the evaluation of muscle.

J E Hicks, T H Shawker, B L Jones, M Linzer, L H Gerber.   

Abstract

We describe a noninvasive quantitative way of measuring muscle with a specially-designed digital ultrasound scanner. Reliability and reproducibility of echo amplitude were determined in 16 normal male volunteers--10 runners and 6 non-runners. Echo amplitudes were recorded from the quadriceps femoris muscle. The muscle was scanned at mid-thigh in a relaxed state with 18 degrees flexion and in an isometrically contracted state with the leg in full extension. Echo amplitudes obtained in the non-runner group were: (1) mean value of the muscle in the relaxed state (174.9 +/- 30.8) and (2) mean value of the muscle in the contracted state (121.8 +/- 31.4). The difference in these values (53.1) was significant at p less than 0.05. Echo amplitudes for runners were: (1) mean value of the muscle in the relaxed state (146.6 +/- 39.2) and (2) mean value of the muscle in the contracted state (107.1 +/- 30.1). The difference in these values (39.5) was significant at p less than -0.01. The data indicate that: values of echo amplitudes are reproducible; there is a statistically significant difference in the mean amplitudes of muscle in a contracted and relaxed state; and while the difference between runner and non-runner muscle is not statistically significant (p greater than 0.1), there is a trend toward significance. Because ultrasound amplitude is a function of tissue structure, this technique may provide a noninvasive method for quantifying muscle collagen and fat.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6703887

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  4 in total

1.  Muscle cross-section measurement by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  R Beneke; J Neuerburg; K Bohndorf
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1991

2.  Novel applications of ultrasound technology to visualize and characterize myofascial trigger points and surrounding soft tissue.

Authors:  Siddhartha Sikdar; Jay P Shah; Tadesse Gebreab; Ru-Huey Yen; Elizabeth Gilliams; Jerome Danoff; Lynn H Gerber
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.966

3.  [Possibilities and limits of interpretation of muscle sonograms. An experimental study of standardized muscle injuries].

Authors:  K Küllmer; J D Rompe; P Eysel; U Harland
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1996-02

4.  Quantitative ultrasound tissue characterization in shoulder and thigh muscles--a new approach.

Authors:  Pernille Kofoed Nielsen; Bente R Jensen; Tron Darvann; Kurt Jørgensen; Merete Bakke
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-01-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.