Literature DB >> 6701252

Denial predicts favorable outcome in unstable angina pectoris.

J L Levenson, R Kay, J Monteferrante, M V Herman.   

Abstract

Denial may be prognostically favorable in patients with acute myocardial infarction. We analyzed the significance of denial in 26 patients referred to a tertiary care center for advanced therapy of unstable angina. Group A comprised 14 patients characterized as deniers on the Hackett--Cassem Denial Scale. Group B comprised 12 nondeniers. There were no differences between groups in multiple baseline social and demographic characteristics, cardiac history, or risk factors. Similarly, there were no differences in the number of diseased vessels or left ventricular function in those patients catheterized (11 Group A patients, 9 Group B patients). Group B, however, had a longer hospitalization until medically stabilized (pain-free for 36 hr) than Group A (5.9 +/- 3.6 days vs. 3.0 +/- 1.6 days; p = 0.02) despite similar treatment regimens. There were no significant differences in incidence of myocardial infarction or need for surgery. There were two deaths--both in Group B patients. We conclude that denial independently predicts rapid medical stabilization in unstable angina patients. Whether it predicts better longterm outcome requires further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6701252     DOI: 10.1097/00006842-198401000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychosom Med        ISSN: 0033-3174            Impact factor:   4.312


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Denial in coronary heart disease].

Authors:  F Sirois
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-08-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Patients' reactions to illness.

Authors:  T Sensky
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-03-10

Review 3.  Screening, diagnosis & monitoring of depression/distress in CHF patients.

Authors:  Mark W Ketterer; Walter Knysz
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.