Literature DB >> 6701052

Methodologic standards for controlled clinical trials of early contact and maternal-infant behavior.

M E Thomson, M S Kramer.   

Abstract

To provide an objective evaluation of published studies on the effect of early contact on subsequent maternal-infant behavior, a set of 11 methodologic standards generally applicable to controlled clinical trials of perinatal care was developed. Sixteen reports of early contact trials were assessed and seven of the 11 standards were found to be satisfactorily fulfilled. The four "problem" standards were: adequate definition of subjects, randomization, subject bias, and treatment contamination (care giver) bias. Of the five best trials fulfilling eight or more of the standards, three reported a beneficial effect of early contact, while two demonstrated no effect. The evidence that early contact improves subsequent maternal-infant behavior thus remains inconclusive. It is urged that for future research in this domain more attention be given to adequate subject definition, strict randomization procedures, and safeguards against bias by the subjects or their care givers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6701052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  4 in total

Review 1.  Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Moore; Gene C Anderson; Nils Bergman; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

2.  Evaluating the quality of longitudinal statistical applications in original publications on Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Chengjie Xiong; Yuxiao Tang; Gerald van Belle; J Philip Miller; Lenore J Launer; John C Morris
Journal:  Neuroepidemiology       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.

Authors:  S H Downs; N Black
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Grading clinical research: a midterm report card.

Authors:  M T Schechter; S B Sheps
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-11-01       Impact factor: 8.262

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.