Literature DB >> 6700894

Inaccuracy of Dubowitz gestational age in low birth weight infants.

J A Spinnato, B M Sibai, D C Shaver, G D Anderson.   

Abstract

The Dubowitz gestational age was compared to the obstetric clinical age of 119 predominantly black mother-infant pairs for whom certain clinical criteria were met. Forty-five hypertensive and 74 nonhypertensive gestations with infant birth weight less than 2500 g were evaluated. Overall the clinical age was 33.6 +/- 4.5 weeks versus 34.7 +/- 4.3 weeks by Dubowitz age (P = NS). The Dubowitz age differed from clinical age by more than 2 weeks in 33.6% (40/119). Of gestations under 33 weeks (clinical age) (N = 45) the clinical age was 30.1 +/- 2.4 weeks as compared to the Dubowitz age of 32.2 +/- 2.7 weeks (P less than .01). Fifty-one percent (23/45) of Dubowitz ages were more than two weeks discordant with the clinical age. The Dubowitz assessment of gestational age may be unacceptably inaccurate in the determination of gestational age in low birth weight infants, particularly in those whose gestational age is less than 33 weeks. The findings suggest that studies in which conclusions were based on the Dubowitz age assessment may need reevaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6700894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of two measures of gestational age among low income births. The potential impact on health studies, New York, 2005.

Authors:  Victoria Lazariu; Christopher F Davis; Louise-Anne McNutt
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-01

2.  Cranial ultrasound assessment of gestational age in low birthweight infants.

Authors:  N P Murphy; J Rennie; R W Cooke
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Gestational assessment assessed.

Authors:  U Wariyar; W Tin; E Hey
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; T C Hulsey; J Mor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Machine learning guided postnatal gestational age assessment using new-born screening metabolomic data in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Sayan Das; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Arup Dutta; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Bruce Bedell; Saikat Deb; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Harshita Mittal; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.105

6.  Prognosis for infants born at 23 to 28 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  V Y Yu; H L Loke; B Bajuk; W Szymonowicz; A A Orgill; J Astbury
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-11-08

7.  Preterm birth: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunisation safety data.

Authors:  Julie-Anne Quinn; Flor M Munoz; Bernard Gonik; Lourdes Frau; Clare Cutland; Tamala Mallett-Moore; Aimee Kissou; Frederick Wittke; Manoj Das; Tony Nunes; Savia Pye; Wendy Watson; Ana-Maria Alguacil Ramos; Jose F Cordero; Wan-Ting Huang; Sonali Kochhar; Jim Buttery
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  External validation of postnatal gestational age estimation using newborn metabolic profiles in Matlab, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Malia Sq Murphy; Steven Hawken; Wei Cheng; Lindsay A Wilson; Monica Lamoureux; Matthew Henderson; Jesmin Pervin; Azad Chowdhury; Courtney Gravett; Eve Lackritz; Beth K Potter; Mark Walker; Julian Little; Anisur Rahman; Pranesh Chakraborty; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Postnatal gestational age estimation via newborn screening analysis: application and potential.

Authors:  Lindsay A Wilson; Malia Sq Murphy; Robin Ducharme; Kathryn Denize; Nafisa M Jadavji; Beth Potter; Julian Little; Pranesh Chakraborty; Steven Hawken; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 3.940

10.  Using AMANHI-ACT cohorts for external validation of Iowa new-born metabolic profiles based models for postnatal gestational age estimation.

Authors:  Sunil Sazawal; Kelli K Ryckman; Harshita Mittal; Rasheda Khanam; Imran Nisar; Elizabeth Jasper; Sayedur Rahman; Usma Mehmood; Sayan Das; Bruce Bedell; Nabidul Haque Chowdhury; Amina Barkat; Arup Dutta; Saikat Deb; Salahuddin Ahmed; Farah Khalid; Rubhana Raqib; Muhammad Ilyas; Ambreen Nizar; Said Mohammed Ali; Alexander Manu; Sachiyo Yoshida; Abdullah H Baqui; Fyezah Jehan; Usha Dhingra; Rajiv Bahl
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 4.413

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.