Literature DB >> 6700054

Problems in the identification of potential organ donors. Misconceptions and fallacies associated with donor cards.

T D Overcast, R W Evans, L E Bowen, M M Hoe, C L Livak.   

Abstract

A survey of organ procurement programs and district attorneys' offices was undertaken in all 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine to what extent organ donor cards were effective in obtaining organs for purposes of transplantation. Results of the survey revealed that all 50 states and the District of Columbia have adopted some form of the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act (UAGA), but in 47 states, even when a signed donor card is available, surgeons still require family approval for removal of organs despite the fact that the provisions of the UAGA do not require this. In addition, it was found that while 44 states have a provision on their permanent drivers' licenses for organ donation, no state requires drivers to indicate whether they want to donate organs. While there is little information on the number of persons who actually carry donor cards, four states indicated that between 1.7% and 8.5% of their drivers were designated as donors. In Colorado, however, it was reported that 60% of all drivers are designated as donors. Nevertheless, in all states it was determined that few actual donors were carrying donor cards at the time of their death. It must therefore be concluded that while donor cards are an excellent educational medium and certainly facilitate the activities of transplant coordination, they are not an effective means of substantially increasing the supply of organs for transplantation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health; Legal Approach; Uniform Anatomical Gift Act

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6700054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  9 in total

Review 1.  Winning hearts and minds: using psychology to promote voluntary organ donation.

Authors:  T Farsides
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2000

2.  Respect for donor choice and the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act.

Authors:  W Edinger
Journal:  J Med Humanit       Date:  1990

Review 3.  Pew Memorial Trust policy synthesis: 5. State coverage for organ transplantation: a framework for decision making.

Authors:  P A Lindsey; E A McGlynn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Medical, ethical, and legal implications of current trends in clinical transplantation: an assessment of the respective roles of government and the private sector in the regulation of transplantation.

Authors:  F T Rapaport; C M Miller; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Time to end softly softly approach on harvesting organs for transplantation.

Authors:  G D Chisholm
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-21

6.  Donor conversion and procurement failure: the fate of our potential organ donors.

Authors:  Bernardino C Branco; Kenji Inaba; Lydia Lam; Ali Salim; Galinos Barmparas; Pedro G R Teixeira; Peep Talving; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Psychosocial variables associated with willingness to donate organs.

Authors:  B E Nolan; N P Spanos
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-07-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Cadaveric organ donation: ethical considerations for a new approach.

Authors:  I Kleinman; F H Lowy
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1989-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Organ procurement in patients with fatal head injuries. The fate of the potential donor.

Authors:  R C Mackersie; O L Bronsther; S R Shackford
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 12.969

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.