Literature DB >> 6699343

A review of the literature and a normative study of accommodative facility.

J A Zellers, T L Alpert, M W Rouse.   

Abstract

Although many different authors have proposed accommodative facility standards, there is little agreement as to what should constitute "normal" accommodative facility. To establish a norm, 100 adult subjects were tested using a vectographic viewing device which was placed 40 cm from 20/30 letters. The letters were viewed alternately with +/- 2.00 D lenses, first monocularly, and then binocularly. The subjects were screened and known to be nonpresbyopic, nonstrabismic, corrected to 20/30 monocularly, and with adequate binocularity. The study found a mean accommodative facility of 11.59 OD, 11.09 OS, and 7.72 cpm binocularly. These findings can be used as a clinical guide by which to evaluate a patient's accommodative facility findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6699343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc        ISSN: 0003-0244


  20 in total

1.  Age variations in intraocular pressure in a cohort of healthy Austrian school children.

Authors:  W A Dusek; B K Pierscionek; J F McClelland
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Randomised clinical trial of the effectiveness of base-in prism reading glasses versus placebo reading glasses for symptomatic convergence insufficiency in children.

Authors:  M Scheiman; S Cotter; M Rouse; G L Mitchell; M Kulp; J Cooper; E Borsting
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Accommodative function in school children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Alvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Changes in accommodation dynamics after alcohol consumption, for two different doses.

Authors:  Miriam Casares-López; José J Castro-Torres; Sonia Ortiz-Peregrina; Carolina Ortiz; Rosario G Anera
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Comparison of visual acuity in reduced lumination and facility of ocular accommodation in table tennis champions and non- players.

Authors:  Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Mohammad R Yarigholi
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  Clinical and laboratory investigations of the relationship of accommodation and convergence function with refractive error. A literature review.

Authors:  D A Goss; H Zhai
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Effects of wearing yellow spectacles on visual skills, reading speed, and visual symptoms in children with reading difficulties.

Authors:  Catalina Palomo-Álvarez; María C Puell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Accommodative facility training with a long term follow up in a sample of school aged children showing accommodative dysfunction.

Authors:  B Sterner; M Abrahamsson; A Sjostrom
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

9.  A survey of visual function in an Austrian population of school-age children with reading and writing difficulties.

Authors:  Wolfgang Dusek; Barbara K Pierscionek; Julie F McClelland
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 10.  Is there any evidence for the validity of diagnostic criteria used for accommodative and nonstrabismic binocular dysfunctions?

Authors:  Pilar Cacho-Martínez; Ángel García-Muñoz; María Teresa Ruiz-Cantero
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.