Literature DB >> 6699313

Assay of the biologic activity of allergen skin test preparations.

F Björkstén, T Haahtela, A Backman, I Suoniemi.   

Abstract

We studied the biologic activity of allergen preparations using a method involving skin prick tests in humans and the use of HEP (histamine equivalent prick) units. Results were found to be dependent on the population groups used in assays. If populations are not carefully standardized, results may vary by 1 power of 10. Accuracy can also be improved by the use of suitable allergen standard reference preparations, but such were not available to us. Confidence ranges for the biologic activities were relatively wide and varied with the allergen preparation and the population group. Typically, the 95% confidence range included values from one-fifth to five times the estimated HEP value when the number of subjects in the assay was 30 to 50 persons. When the preparations representing the same source material (e.g., timothy pollen) were assayed simultaneously in one population group of this size, a twofold or larger difference in HEP values generally proved significant. An examination of 43 commercial products showed that allergen preparations with biologic activities declared in HEP units had a more uniform biologic activity than those assayed with traditional methods and units (PNU/ml or weight/volume).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6699313     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(84)90404-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  2 in total

1.  Are allergen batch differences and the use of double skin prick test important?

Authors:  Gert F Thomsen; Vivi Schlünssen; Lars R Skadhauge; Tine Halsen Malling; David L Sherson; Øyvind Omland; Torben Sigsgaard
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.317

2.  Evaluation of major mite allergens from European standardized commercial extracts for in vivo diagnosis: addressing the need for precision medicine.

Authors:  Ruperto González-Pérez; Paloma Poza-Guedes; Yvelise Barrios Del Pino; Víctor Matheu; Inmaculada Sánchez-Machín
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.871

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.