Literature DB >> 6697170

Comprehension of main ideas and details in coherent and noncoherent discourse by aphasic and nonaphasic listeners.

M L Wegner, R H Brookshire, L E Nicholas.   

Abstract

Aphasic and nonaphasic listeners' comprehension of main ideas and details within coherent and noncoherent narrative discourse was examined. Coherent paragraphs contained one topic to which all sentences in the paragraph related. Noncoherent paragraphs contained a change in topic with every third or fourth sentence. Each paragraph contained four main ideas and one or more details that related to each main idea. Listeners' responses to yes/no questions following each paragraph yielded the following results: (1) Nonaphasic listeners comprehended the paragraphs better than aphasic listeners. (2) Both aphasic and nonaphasic listeners comprehended main ideas better than they comprehended details. (3) Coherence did not affect comprehension of main ideas for either group. (4) Coherence did not affect comprehension of details by nonaphasic subjects. (5) Coherence affected comprehension of details by aphasic subjects, and their comprehension of details in coherent paragraphs was worse than their comprehension of details in noncoherent paragraphs. There was no significant correlation between Token Test scores and measures of paragraph comprehension.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6697170     DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(84)90034-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  5 in total

1.  Neural mechanisms of discourse comprehension: a human lesion study.

Authors:  Aron K Barbey; Roberto Colom; Jordan Grafman
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Contextual influences on narrative discourse in normal young adults.

Authors:  C A Coelho; B Z Liles; R J Duffy
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1990-11

3.  The effect of a sentence comprehension treatment on discourse comprehension in aphasia.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; Carrie Des Roches; Sarah Villard; Yorghos Tripodis
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.773

4.  Discourse Impairments Following Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Clinton L Johns; Kristen M Tooley; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  Lang Linguist Compass       Date:  2008-11

5.  Hemispheric differences in the organization of memory for text ideas.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Clinton L Johns; Eunike Jonathan
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.381

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.