Literature DB >> 6696811

To catheterise or not to catheterise? An approach based on decision theory.

F Macartney, J Douglas, D Spiegelhalter.   

Abstract

To determine whether or not patients require cardiac catheterisation before surgery a computer based mathematical model was constructed based on decision theory. The model was specifically applied to sick infants under 3 months of age with suspected coarctation of the aorta, and a three way sensitivity analysis was carried out to assess the effects on the model of changes in the probabilities that underlie the decision itself. The optimal decision (that with the greater survival rate) was moved away from cardiac catheterisation to confirm the diagnosis towards operating without cardiac catheterisation by the following factors: a higher probability of survival of operation both in the presence and absence of coarctation; a higher probability of survival if there was no coarctation and no operation performed; a lower sensitivity of catheterisation; a greater incremental risk of operation resulting from previous catheterisation; and a higher relative risk of catheterisation in patients without as opposed to with coarctation. Factors that tended significantly to move the decision towards catheterisation to rule out coarctation rather than neither to operate nor to catheterise were: a lower risk of surgery for coarctation if present; a higher risk of failing to operate on a patient who had coarctation; a high specificity of cardiac catheterisation; a lower incrementation of surgical risk by previous cardiac catheterisation; and a lower relative risk of catheterisation if coarctation was absent. In this institution, the model argues strongly against cardiac catheterisation in the great majority of sick infants with coarctation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6696811      PMCID: PMC481508          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.51.3.330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Heart J        ISSN: 0007-0769


  6 in total

1.  Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis; symbolic logic, probability, and value theory aid our understanding of how physicians reason.

Authors:  R S LEDLEY; L B LUSTED
Journal:  Science       Date:  1959-07-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The surgical decision in tetralogy of Fallot: weighing risks and benefits with decision analysis.

Authors:  A Garson; G A Gorry; D G McNamara; D A Cooley
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Recurrent deep venous thrombosis in pregnancy. Analysis of the risks and benefits of anticoagulation.

Authors:  K Klein; S G Pauker
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Clinical decision analysis by personal computer.

Authors:  S G Pauker; J P Kassirer
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1981-12

5.  Coronary artery surgery: the use of decision analysis.

Authors:  S G Pauker
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Cross-sectional echocardiographic assessment of coarctation in the sick neonate and infant.

Authors:  J F Smallhorn; J C Huhta; P A Adams; R H Anderson; J L Wilkinson; F J Macartney
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1983-10
  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Diagnostic logic.

Authors:  F J Macartney
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1987-11-21
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.