Literature DB >> 6695309

Endoscopic evaluation of dysphagia in two hundred and ninety-three patients with benign disease.

W A Webb, L McDaniel, L Jones.   

Abstract

A total of 538 dilations were performed upon 293 patients evaluated at our unit. Of these, 4.8 per cent had cervical webs, 3.0 per cent had cricopharyngeal dysfunction, 9.2 per cent had undetermined cause, 3.4 per cent had achalasia, 65.5 per cent had peptic strictures, 3.8 per cent had Schatzki's ring, 2.4 per cent had esophagitis, 6.1 per cent had postoperative strictures, 0.3 per cent had caustic stricture and 1.4 per cent had extrinsic compression. True dysphagia should always be investigated through a careful history, physical examination, barium study, endoscopy and, infrequently, esophageal manometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6695309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet        ISSN: 0039-6087


  3 in total

1.  Does empiric esophageal dilation benefit dysphagia when endoscopy is normal?

Authors:  J B Marshall; T A Chowdhury
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Oropharyngeal dysphagia.

Authors:  Robert S Bulat; Roy C Orlando
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-08

3.  Swallowing complaints and cineradiographic abnormalities of the pharynx.

Authors:  S Lindgren; O Ekberg
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.438

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.