Literature DB >> 6694223

Bullet fragmentation: a major cause of tissue disruption.

M L Fackler, J S Surinchak, J A Malinowski, R E Bowen.   

Abstract

Effects of nonfragmenting solid brass bullets (5.56 mm, 3.1 gm, 1.9 cm long, machine-made at Letterman Army Institute of Research) and fragmenting soft-point bullets (5.56 mm, 3.2 gm, 1.7 cm long, commercially made by Hornady Manufacturing Co., Grand Island, NE) were compared when they were fired through soft tissue of the hind legs of five live swine (50 to 70 kg). The swine were anesthetized endotracheally (0.8% halothane) and placed in the supine position with the hind legs extended. Blocks of tissue simulant (10% gelatin at 4 degrees C, molded in blocks 20 X 22 X 47 cm) were placed against the skin at the predicted point of bullet exit. All shots (a fragmenting bullet through one hind leg and a nonfragmenting bullet through the other hind leg of each swine) were fired at a range of 3 m from a rifle with a bullet tract at 90 degrees to the long axis of the swine's body. Bullet velocities ranged from 930 to 990 m/s. Dissections of the bullet tract (through tissue and gelatin) revealed that tissue disruption from the fragmenting bullets was significantly greater (p less than 0.001) than from nonfragmenting bullets. The recovered bullets were weighed. The results showed that the fragmenting bullet lost 59 to 77% of its original weight and the nonfragmenting bullet was the same weight as originally. Recognition of the amount of tissue disruption and identification of bullet fragments in the wounds resulting from the two different bullets should be a useful guide to operating surgeons in selecting the best approach for treatment of gunshot injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6694223

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  15 in total

1.  The Red Cross classification of war wounds: the E.X.C.F.V.M. scoring system.

Authors:  R M Coupland
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Field surgery on a future conventional battlefield: strategy and wound management.

Authors:  J M Ryan; G J Cooper; I R Haywood; S M Milner
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  High velocity gunshot injuries to the extremities: management on and off the battlefield.

Authors:  Jowan G Penn-Barwell; Kate V Brown; C Anton Fries
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2015-09

4.  The influence of the counterfort while ballistic testing using gelatine blocks.

Authors:  C Schyma; N Herr; J Brünig; E Brenčičová; R Müller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.686

Review 5.  Wound ballistics 101: the mechanisms of soft tissue wounding by bullets.

Authors:  P K Stefanopoulos; D E Pinialidis; G F Hadjigeorgiou; K N Filippakis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.693

6.  Terminal ballistics of the 7.62 mm NATO bullet. Autopsy findings.

Authors:  P J Knudsen; P Theilade
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  The initial yaw of some commonly encountered military rifle bullets.

Authors:  P J Knudsen; O H Sørensen
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.686

8.  Clinical and legal significance of fragmentation of bullets in relation to size of wounds: retrospective analysis.

Authors:  R Coupland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-14

Review 9.  Penetrating gunshots to the head and lack of immediate incapacitation. I. Wound ballistics and mechanisms of incapacitation.

Authors:  B Karger
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.686

10.  The Role of Ultrasound in Penetrating Trauma.

Authors:  Jorge Sproviero
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.693

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.