Literature DB >> 6694183

The Marshall and Stickler syndromes: objective rejection of lumping.

S Aymé, M Preus.   

Abstract

To answer the question of whether nosological splitting of the Marshall and Stickler syndromes is justified at the phenotypic level, we surveyed published reports on the two syndromes and applied an objective method to determine this. A set of 18 patients with clinical description, photographs, and radiographs was used to tabulate a list of 53 signs. Cluster analysis using these signs showed that there are two groups of patients with different phenotypes. An index score based on the 20 most discriminating signs was applied to other reported patients and the authors' diagnosis confirmed. There is therefore no objective reason to consider that these two syndromes are not separate dominant disorders with variable expressivity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6694183      PMCID: PMC1049203          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.21.1.34

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  18 in total

1.  Letter: The demise of the Marshall syndrome.

Authors:  M M Cohen
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1974-12       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  The Marshall syndrome: report of a new family.

Authors:  H Zellweger; J K Smith; P Grützner
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 4.406

3.  Formal analysis of dysmorphism: objective methods of syndrome definition.

Authors:  M Preus; S Aymé
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Marshall/Stickler syndrome.

Authors:  M Baraitser
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  The numerical versus intuitive approach to syndrome nosology.

Authors:  M Preus
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1980

6.  Stickler syndrome. Presenting as a syndrome of cleft palate, myopia and blindness inherited as a dominant trait.

Authors:  J Hall
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1974

7.  Vitreoretinal degeneration as a sign of generalized connective tissue diseases.

Authors:  I H Maumenee
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Inherited hyaloideoretinopathy and skeletal dysplasia.

Authors:  W H Knobloch
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1975

9.  [A case of heriditary arthro-ophthalmopathy: Stickler's syndrome].

Authors:  M Brihaye-Van Geertruyden; L Verlaeken; R Herzeel; M C Swinnen; A Malfroot
Journal:  Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol       Date:  1979

10.  Stickler's syndrome (hereditary progressive arthro-ophthalmopathy).

Authors:  J S Popkin; R C Polomeno
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1974-11-16       Impact factor: 8.262

View more
  11 in total

1.  Splicing mutations of 54-bp exons in the COL11A1 gene cause Marshall syndrome, but other mutations cause overlapping Marshall/Stickler phenotypes.

Authors:  S Annunen; J Körkkö; M Czarny; M L Warman; H G Brunner; H Kääriäinen; J B Mulliken; L Tranebjaerg; D G Brooks; G F Cox; J R Cruysberg; M A Curtis; S L Davenport; C A Friedrich; I Kaitila; M R Krawczynski; A Latos-Bielenska; S Mukai; B R Olsen; N Shinno; M Somer; M Vikkula; J Zlotogora; D J Prockop; L Ala-Kokko
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Microspherophakia-metaphyseal dysplasia: a 'new' dominantly inherited bone dysplasia with severe eye involvement.

Authors:  A Verloes; L Van Maldergem; P de Marneffe; J L Dufier; P Maroteaux
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  Stickler's syndrome.

Authors:  I K Temple
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  COL9A2 and COL9A3 mutations in canine autosomal recessive oculoskeletal dysplasia.

Authors:  Orly Goldstein; Richard Guyon; Anna Kukekova; Tatyana N Kuznetsova; Susan E Pearce-Kelling; Jennifer Johnson; Gustavo D Aguirre; Gregory M Acland
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.957

Review 5.  Clinical and Molecular genetics of Stickler syndrome.

Authors:  M P Snead; J R Yates
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 6.  Stickler syndrome, ocular-only variants and a key diagnostic role for the ophthalmologist.

Authors:  M P Snead; A M McNinch; A V Poulson; P Bearcroft; B Silverman; P Gomersall; V Parfect; A J Richards
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  Marshall syndrome associated with a splicing defect at the COL11A1 locus.

Authors:  A J Griffith; L K Sprunger; D A Sirko-Osadsa; G E Tiller; M H Meisler; M L Warman
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Collagen 11a1 is indirectly activated by lymphocyte enhancer-binding factor 1 (Lef1) and negatively regulates osteoblast maturation.

Authors:  Rachel A Kahler; Sorcha M C Yingst; Luke H Hoeppner; Eric D Jensen; David Krawczak; Julia T Oxford; Jennifer J Westendorf
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 11.583

9.  Significant ophthalmoarthropathy associated with ectodermal dysplasia in a child with Marshall-Stickler overlap: a case report.

Authors:  Ali Al Kaissi; Rudolf Ganger; Klaus Klaushofer; Franz Grill
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2008-10-24

Review 10.  A novel mutation in the COL2A1 gene in a patient with Stickler syndrome type 1: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yousuke Higuchi; Kosei Hasegawa; Miho Yamashita; Hiroyuki Tanaka; Hirokazu Tsukahara
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2017-08-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.