Literature DB >> 6693932

Responses of single neurons in posterior field of cat auditory cortex to tonal stimulation.

D P Phillips, S S Orman.   

Abstract

In the auditory cortex of barbiturate-anesthetized cats, the posterior auditory field (field P) was identified by its tonotopic organization, and single neurons in that field were studied quantitatively for their sensitivity to the frequency and intensity of tonal stimuli presented via calibrated, sealed stimulating systems. Field P neurons had narrow, V-shaped, threshold frequency tuning curves. At suprathreshold levels, spike counts were generally greatest at frequencies at or close to the neuron's threshold best frequency (BF). Eighty-six percent of posterior-field neurons displayed spike counts that were a nonmonotonic function of the intensity of a BF tone. Of these, over 90% showed at least a 50% reduction in spike count at high stimulus levels, and almost 20% of nonmonotonic cells ceased responding entirely at high stimulus intensities. The nonmonotonic shape of spike count-versus-intensity profiles was typically preserved across the range of frequencies to which any given neuron was responsive. For some neurons, this had the consequence of generating a completely circumscribed frequency-intensity response area. That is, these neurons responded to a tonal stimulus only if the stimulus was within a restricted range of both frequency and intensity. These response areas showed internal organizations that appeared to reflect one or both of two processes. For some neurons, the optimal sound pressure level for spike counts varied with tone frequency, roughly paralleling the threshold tuning curve. For other neurons, the optimal sound pressure level tended to be constant across frequency despite threshold variations of up to 20 dB. The minimum response latencies of posterior-field neurons were generally in the range of 20-50 ms, while cells in the primary auditory cortex (AI) in the same animals generally had minimum latent periods of less than 20 ms. Comparison of these data with those previously presented for neurons in two other cortical auditory fields suggests that the cat's auditory cortex might show an interfield segregation of neurons according to their coding properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6693932     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1984.51.1.147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  22 in total

1.  A unifying basis of auditory thresholds based on temporal summation.

Authors:  Peter Heil; Heinrich Neubauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Functional topography of cat primary auditory cortex: representation of tone intensity.

Authors:  C E Schreiner; J R Mendelson; M L Sutter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Areas of cat auditory cortex as defined by neurofilament proteins expressing SMI-32.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Mellott; Estel Van der Gucht; Charles C Lee; Andres Carrasco; Jeffery A Winer; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Fine functional organization of auditory cortex revealed by Fourier optical imaging.

Authors:  Valery A Kalatsky; Daniel B Polley; Michael M Merzenich; Christoph E Schreiner; Michael P Stryker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Interconnections of the auditory cortical fields of the cat with the cingulate and parahippocampal cortices.

Authors:  E M Rouiller; G M Innocenti; F De Ribaupierre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Nonmonotonic synaptic excitation and imbalanced inhibition underlying cortical intensity tuning.

Authors:  Guangying K Wu; Pingyang Li; Huizhong W Tao; Li I Zhang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  Spectral and temporal processing in rat posterior auditory cortex.

Authors:  Pritesh K Pandya; Daniel L Rathbun; Raluca Moucha; Navzer D Engineer; Michael P Kilgard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Spatial sensitivity of neurons in the anterior, posterior, and primary fields of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  Ian A Harrington; G Christopher Stecker; Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Do cross-modal projections always result in multisensory integration?

Authors:  Brian L Allman; Ruben E Bittencourt-Navarrete; Leslie P Keniston; Alexandre E Medina; Meng Y Wang; M Alex Meredith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-01-17       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Evidence for hierarchical processing in cat auditory cortex: nonreciprocal influence of primary auditory cortex on the posterior auditory field.

Authors:  Andres Carrasco; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.