Literature DB >> 6692388

Differences between estrogen- and antiestrogen-estrogen receptor complexes from human breast tumors identified with an antibody raised against the estrogen receptor.

A C Tate, G L Greene, E R DeSombre, E V Jensen, V C Jordan.   

Abstract

Radiolabeled estrogens 17 beta-[3H]estradiol and diethylstilbestrol ( [3H]DES) and the antiestrogen [3H]monohydroxytamoxifen ( [3H]MHT) all bind with high affinity to the extranuclear estrogen receptor (ER) from the MCF-7 human breast tumor cell line (Kd = 3 X 10(-10), 2 X 10(-10), and 0.63 X 10(-10) M, respectively). A polyclonal antibody raised in a goat to the calf nuclear ER selectively decreased the binding affinity and number of binding sites for 17 beta-[3H]estradiol, but did not appear to affect these binding parameters for [3H]MHT. In the presence of goat antibody, the binding of the nonsteroidal estrogen DES was so perturbed that it was not possible to quantitate the decreased number of binding sites or affinity of this compound as assessed by Scatchard saturation analysis. These results were confirmed in human breast tumor cytosols by sucrose density gradient analysis. The binding of 17 beta-[3H]-estradiol and [3H]DES to the ER was significantly reduced by preincubation with the polyclonal antibody, whereas the binding of [3H]MHT was reduced only when the tumor cytosol was preincubated with a very high concentration of antibody. At these concentrations of antibody, the binding of 17 beta-[3H]estradiol and [3H]DES to the receptor was prevented completely. In contrast, when the antibody was added to the tumor cytosol after the 3H-ligand had bound to the receptor, the binding properties of all 3H-ligands were unaffected. The [3H]MHT-ER antibody complex consistently sedimented as a higher-molecular-weight complex on sucrose density gradients than did the corresponding estrogenic complexes. The decrease in the affinity of estrogenic ligands can be explained in part by an increase in the dissociation rate at 4 degrees of these compounds from the ER. The dissociation rate of MHT was unaffected by the goat antibody. These results imply that there are important differences in the binding of antiestrogen and estrogens to the tumor cytosol ER. A ligand-binding model is proposed that may aid in the understanding of antiestrogen action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6692388

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  12 in total

1.  Structure-function relationships of the raloxifene-estrogen receptor-alpha complex for regulating transforming growth factor-alpha expression in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Woo-Chan Park; David J Bentrem; Kevin P McKian; Alexander De Los Reyes; Jessica A Loweth; Jennifer MacGregor Schafer; James W Zapf; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Oestrogenic and antioestrogenic actions in a series of triphenylbut-1-enes: modulation of prolactin synthesis in vitro.

Authors:  V C Jordan; R Koch; S Mittal; M R Schneider
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  The molecular, cellular and clinical consequences of targeting the estrogen receptor following estrogen deprivation therapy.

Authors:  Ping Fan; Philipp Y Maximov; Ramona F Curpan; Balkees Abderrahman; V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.102

4.  Rapid induction of the c-jun protooncogene in the avian oviduct by the antiestrogen tamoxifen.

Authors:  C K Lau; M Subramaniam; K Rasmussen; T C Spelsberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-02-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The SERM Saga, Something from Nothing: American Cancer Society/SSO Basic Science Lecture.

Authors:  V Craig Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Molecular mechanisms of antiestrogen action in breast cancer.

Authors:  V C Jordan
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Binding of antiestrogens exposes an occult antigenic determinant in the human estrogen receptor.

Authors:  P M Martin; Y Berthois; E V Jensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Antiestrogen action in breast cancer cells: modulation of proliferation and protein synthesis, and interaction with estrogen receptors and additional antiestrogen binding sites.

Authors:  B S Katzenellenbogen; M A Miller; A Mullick; Y Y Sheen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Mechanisms of endocrine resistance in breast cancer: an overview of the proposed roles of noncoding RNA.

Authors:  Erin L Hayes; Joan S Lewis-Wambi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Optimised analysis of tamoxifen and its main metabolites in the plasma and cytosol of mammary tumours.

Authors:  G Milano; M C Etienne; M Frenay; R Khater; J L Formento; N Renee; J L Moll; M Francoual; M Berto; M Namer
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.