Literature DB >> 6692274

Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast Cancers (protocol no. 4). X. Discriminants for tenth year treatment failure.

E R Fisher, R Sass, B Fisher.   

Abstract

A search for prognostic discriminants of treatment failure in the tenth postmastectomy year was undertaken in 614 patients enrolled in protocol no. 4 of the National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast Cancers treated by radical mastectomy. Exploratory analyses of 38 pathologic and 6 clinical features disclosed 16 and 13 variables significantly related to nodal status and treatment failure, respectively. However, multivariate analyses with life tables adjusted or controlled for nodal status revealed that patients whose tumors measured less than 2 cm had a more favorable clinical course. All of the characteristics were also explored when patients were stratified according to numbers of nodal metastases, the most significant prognostic discriminant for disease-free survival in the tenth year. A germinal center predominance lymph node pattern and high histologic grade according to our conventional grading method were observed to adversely influence disease-free survival in patients with negative nodes. A strong trend in this manner was also observed with tumors greater than or equal to 2 cm and types 3 and 5 scar cancers. Histologic grade and tumor size were significantly recognized as discriminatory in patients with 4+ nodes but no factors were significantly observed in the group of patients with 1 to 3 positive nodes. A possible explanation for this inconsistency is discussed. For the most part, these factors were also encountered by us previously at the 5-year postoperative period. Only the presence of 13+ nodal metastases and types 3 and 5 scar cancers and cancers without scar appeared to discriminate success or failure between the fifth and tenth year. It is therefore concluded that nodal category, germinal center predominance, histologic grade, and tumor size, in the contexts noted, represent strong prognostic discriminants exerting a rather constant influence on disease-free survival at least to the tenth postmastectomy period. The prognostic value of categorizing those patients with 4+ positive nodes into subgroups with 4 to 6, 7 to 12 and 13+ is reaffirmed. The actual disease-free survival of patients in the tenth year was not strikingly different from that observed previously by us at 5 years in this cohort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6692274     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<712::aid-cncr2820531320>3.0.co;2-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  42 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative assessment of prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  H Denley; S E Pinder; C W Elston; A H Lee; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Practice patterns of lymph-node mapping and sentinel-node biopsy for breast cancer in British Columbia.

Authors:  Boon Chua; Ivo A Olivotto; James C Donald; Allen H Hayashi; Noelle Davis; Conrad H Rusnak
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Galea; R W Blamey; C E Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Comparison of extent of disease and morphometric and DNA flow cytometric prognostic factors in invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  A M Uyterlinde; N W Schipper; J P Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Nuclear pleomorphism, a strong prognostic factor in axillary node-negative small invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  M Stierer; H Rosen; R Weber
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Biological indices in the assessment of breast cancer.

Authors:  A S Leong; A K Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Pathol       Date:  1995-10

7.  A rapid, fully automated, molecular-based assay accurately analyzes sentinel lymph nodes for the presence of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Steven J Hughes; Liqiang Xi; Siva Raja; William Gooding; David J Cole; William E Gillanders; Keidi Mikhitarian; Kenneth McCarty; Susan Silver; Jesus Ching; William McMillan; James D Luketich; Tony E Godfrey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Intraoperative touch imprint cytology of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer: experience at a tertiary care center in Mexico.

Authors:  V M Pérez-Sánchez; T A Vela-Chávez; P Villarreal-Colin; E Bargalló-Rocha; M T Ramírez-Ugalde; D Munoz-Gonzalez; I Zeichner-Gancz
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  Progesterone binding cyst protein (PBCP) in primary breast cancer: a new prognostic factor?

Authors:  J A Søreide; O A Lea; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Charity Hospital experience with long-term survival and prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer with localized or regional disease.

Authors:  C M Sutherland; F J Mather
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.