Literature DB >> 6692268

Mammography. State of the art.

G D Dodd.   

Abstract

In recent years, the criticism of mammography as a diagnostic and/or survey procedure has decreased, primarily due to the perception that there has been an increase in quality and a concomitant decrease in risk. A review of the physical changes in mammographic equipment, the characteristics of current image receptors and dosimetry indicates that this assumption is correct. The results of the examination of 280,000 women from the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project centers also support this conclusion. When all factors are considered it is reasonable to conclude that the potential benefits of mammography far outweigh the minimal risk incurred by the examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6692268     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840201)53:3+<652::aid-cncr2820531310>3.0.co;2-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  3 in total

1.  Breast Examination: What's Reasonable?

Authors:  D S Esdaile
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  [Possibilities and limits of the early detection of breast cancer by mammography and other methods].

Authors:  H U Lohbeck
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  C J Baines
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.275

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.