Literature DB >> 6691119

Dosage evaluation in mammography.

L Stanton, T Villafana, J L Day, D A Lightfoot.   

Abstract

Estimates of breast dose per view are needed for selection of mammographic techniques and verification of their proper use. However, accurate dosimetry requires standardization of both the methodology and the assumed breast composition. Because several different methods have been reported, the authors developed a simple and reproducible method using a reference "average breast" composition of 50/50% water/fat by weight. Working curves were derived for average glandular and whole-breast dose per unit of exposure in air vs. HVL and thickness. When these curves are combined with on-site measurements of exposure per view, one obtains values of dose per view for each technique. Factors were also computed to correct dosage from the reference composition to other breast compositions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6691119     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.

Authors:  Mark B Williams; Priya Raghunathan; Mitali J More; J Anthony Seibert; Alexander Kwan; Joseph Y Lo; Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Laurie L Fajardo; Allen McGruder; Sandra M McGruder; Andrew D A Maidment; Martin J Yaffe; Aili Bloomquist; Gordon E Mawdsley
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The myth of the 50-50 breast.

Authors:  M J Yaffe; J M Boone; N Packard; O Alonzo-Proulx; S Y Huang; C L Peressotti; A Al-Mayah; K Brock
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Two-dimensional breast dosimetry improved using three-dimensional breast image data.

Authors:  John M Boone; Andrew M Hernandez; J Anthony Seibert
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Alice Averbukh; Catherine Moran; Eric A Berns; Martin J Yaffe; Benjamin Herman; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present).

Authors:  Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Steven L Simon; Robert M Weinstock; Deukwoo Kwon; Martha S Linet
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.841

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.