Literature DB >> 6691103

Magnetic resonance imaging of the pericardium: normal and pathologic findings.

D D Stark, C B Higgins, P Lanzer, M J Lipton, N Schiller, L E Crooks, E B Botvinick, L Kaufman.   

Abstract

Twenty normal subjects and ten patients with pericardial abnormalities underwent ECG-gated magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the thorax using a 0.35-tesla superconducting system. The patients with pericardial abnormalities were also evaluated with serial chest radiographs, ultrasound, computed tomography, and/or angiography. ECG gating was necessary to identify the normal pericardium, which was visualized as a 1- to 2-mm-wide curvilinear structure of low signal intensity. Pericardial thickening in constrictive pericarditis was clearly delineated on gated MR images. Pericardial inflammation caused a marked increase in signal intensity as well as thickening of the pericardium. Pericardial effusions and pericardial adhesions were also demonstrated. A simple pericardial cyst and a complex pericardial mass were identified and differentiated from pericardial fat and diaphragmatic eventration. MR appears to be an important modality for the evaluation of pericardial disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6691103     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.150.2.6691103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  17 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Case presentation and review: constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  L Osterberg; R Vagelos; J E Atwood
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-10

4.  MR imaging findings in 76 consecutive surgically proven cases of pericardial disease with CT and pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Phillip M Young; James F Glockner; Eric E Williamson; Michael F Morris; Philip A Araoz; Paul R Julsrud; Hartzell V Schaff; William D Edwards; Jae K Oh; Jerome F Breen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Delayed contrast enhancement in a patient with perimyocarditis on contrast-enhanced cardiac MRI: case report.

Authors:  Kunihiko Teraoka; Masaharu Hirano; Minoru Yannbe; Yuka Ohtaki; Toyoyuki Ohkubo; Kimihiko Abe; Akira Yamashina
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2005 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging of the heart.

Authors:  R E Steiner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  Imaging for anaesthetists: a review of the methods and anaesthetic implications of diagnostic imaging techniques.

Authors:  G Weston; L Strunin; G M Amundson
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1985-09

Review 8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and its electrocardiographs (ECG): tips and tricks.

Authors:  Marcelo Souto Nacif; Anna Zavodni; Nadine Kawel; Eui-Young Choi; João A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the heart compared with anatomic and ultrasonographic data.

Authors:  J L De Brux; J M Pernes; P h Grenier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pericardial diseases.

Authors:  Jan Bogaert; Marco Francone
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.